Foundational epistemic doctrine defining the cognitive integrity requirements for AI–human scientific workflows. Establishes the eight axioms of neurotransparency.
-
Updated
Dec 16, 2025
Foundational epistemic doctrine defining the cognitive integrity requirements for AI–human scientific workflows. Establishes the eight axioms of neurotransparency.
Governance, architecture, and epistemic framework for the Aurora Workflow Orchestration ecosystem (AWO, CRI-CORE, and scientific case studies).
Open letter to David Chalmers and David Bourget addresses serious fiduciary governance failures, conflicts of interest, and lack of transparency at PhilPapers, calling urgently for accountability and reform to protect epistemic justice in academia.
A philosophical and fiduciary analysis expanding on Joel Suss’s Financial Times “Free Lunch” column (26 Oct 2025). This paper argues that America’s polarised economy reflects a fiduciary collapse of trust across political, corporate, and civic systems, proposing epistemic humility as a framework for renewal.
A landmark interdisciplinary study that redefines cognitive dissonance and trust as foundations of knowing. Not a psychology paper but a theory-of-knowledge manifesto in psychological form—bridging mind, ethics, and governance.
Add a description, image, and links to the epistemic-governance topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
To associate your repository with the epistemic-governance topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."