-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
bug bash: updated test cases #198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughUpdate Cypress e2e tests across multiple features to remove intermediate menu interactions (MoreIcon clicks), replacing them with direct action buttons (EditIcon, DeleteIcon, copy-icon) to align with UI component refactoring. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cypress/e2e/staffmanagement/StaffManagement.spec.ts (1)
29-39: Inconsistentdata-testidnaming across test files.This file uses
EditIcon(PascalCase) whileFlow.spec.tsusesedit-icon(kebab-case). Verify this is intentional due to different components, or consider standardizing the selector naming convention across the test suite.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for selector naming patterns across test files # Looking for variations of edit-icon/EditIcon selectors echo "=== EditIcon (PascalCase) usage ===" rg -n "data-testid.*EditIcon" --type=ts echo "" echo "=== edit-icon (kebab-case) usage ===" rg -n "data-testid.*edit-icon" --type=tsAlso applies to: 62-72, 82-82, 95-95, 108-108
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
cypress/e2e/flow/Flow.spec.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/interactiveMessage/InteractiveMessage.spec.ts(0 hunks)cypress/e2e/search/Search.spec.ts(0 hunks)cypress/e2e/staffmanagement/StaffManagement.spec.ts(3 hunks)cypress/e2e/template/SpeedSend.spec.ts(0 hunks)cypress/e2e/waGroup/Collection.spec.ts(0 hunks)cypress/support/collection.js(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- cypress/support/collection.js
- cypress/e2e/waGroup/Collection.spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/search/Search.spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/interactiveMessage/InteractiveMessage.spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/template/SpeedSend.spec.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: glific (1.18.3-otp-27, 27.3.3)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cypress/e2e/flow/Flow.spec.ts (3)
148-149: Inconsistent MoreIcon usage pattern.The test still clicks
MoreIconbefore clickingedit-icon. Based on the PR objective to remove intermediate menu interactions, verify whether theMoreIconclick on line 148 should also be removed—similar to how line 210 directly clickscopy-iconwithout a precedingMoreIconstep.
198-199: Same inconsistency as above—MoreIcon retained before edit-icon.This test retains the
MoreIconclick before theedit-iconaction. Confirm this aligns with the actual UI behavior after the refactor. If the UI now shows the edit icon directly in the row (without a menu), remove line 198.
204-214: LGTM—direct copy-icon interaction without MoreIcon.This correctly implements the pattern of directly clicking the action icon without an intermediate menu step, consistent with the PR's stated objective.
cypress/e2e/staffmanagement/StaffManagement.spec.ts (3)
76-87: LGTM—MoreIcon step removed for direct EditIcon access.The test now directly clicks
EditIconwithout an intermediate menu, aligning with the UI refactor.
89-100: LGTM—consistent with the direct action pattern.
102-112: LGTM—direct navigation without MoreIcon.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.