Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 30, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@randygrok
Copy link

@randygrok randygrok commented May 28, 2025

Overview

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated internal method signatures to support additional parameters. No changes to user-facing features or functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The ExecuteTxs method in PureEngineClient was updated to accept an additional metadata parameter. The corresponding call to this method in InitChain was modified to provide nil for the new parameter. No other logic or control flow was changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
execution.go Updated ExecuteTxs method signature to include metadata parameter; updated call in InitChain to pass nil for metadata.

Poem

A method grew, a field anew,
Metadata joined the crew.
InitChain called with nil in hand,
The code marched on, just as planned.
With bytes and roots and time in tow,
The engine’s ready—let’s go, let’s go!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@randygrok randygrok marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2025 20:43
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
execution.go (1)

212-212: Clarify the purpose and usage of the metadata parameter.

The new metadata parameter is currently unused in the method implementation. While this might be intentional for future IBC compatibility, please clarify:

  1. How does this parameter specifically address the IBC issue mentioned in the PR title?
  2. Should the metadata be used within this method or is it intended for interface compatibility only?

Consider adding a comment explaining the parameter's purpose:

-func (c *PureEngineClient) ExecuteTxs(ctx context.Context, txs [][]byte, blockHeight uint64, timestamp time.Time, prevStateRoot []byte, metadata map[string]interface{}) (updatedStateRoot []byte, maxBytes uint64, err error) {
+// ExecuteTxs executes the given transactions at the specified block height and timestamp
+// metadata parameter is reserved for IBC-related data (currently unused)
+func (c *PureEngineClient) ExecuteTxs(ctx context.Context, txs [][]byte, blockHeight uint64, timestamp time.Time, prevStateRoot []byte, metadata map[string]interface{}) (updatedStateRoot []byte, maxBytes uint64, err error) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0975735 and 4c86f35.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • execution.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI and Release
execution.go

[error] 32-32: vet: cannot use (*PureEngineClient)(nil) as Executor value: *PureEngineClient does not implement Executor interface (wrong type for method ExecuteTxs)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
execution.go (2)

142-142: Call site correctly updated for new method signature.

The call to ExecuteTxs has been properly updated to include the new metadata parameter as nil, which is appropriate for the genesis block initialization context.

Note: This change is contingent on resolving the interface mismatch issue identified in the compilation error.


32-32:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Critical: Interface mismatch causing compilation failure.

The compilation error indicates that PureEngineClient no longer implements the Executor interface due to the changed ExecuteTxs method signature. The interface likely expects the old signature without the metadata parameter.

To resolve this, either:

  1. Update the execution.Executor interface to include the metadata parameter
  2. Revert the method signature to match the existing interface

Let me verify the current interface definition:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the Executor interface definition to understand the expected ExecuteTxs signature
# Expected: Find the interface definition and compare with current implementation

# Search for Executor interface definition
ast-grep --pattern $'type Executor interface {
  $$$
  ExecuteTxs($$$) $$$
  $$$
}'

# Also search for any ExecuteTxs method calls that might break
rg -A 3 -B 1 "ExecuteTxs.*\(" --type go

Length of output: 1500


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate the Executor interface definition and inspect the ExecuteTxs signature
rg -n "type Executor interface" -g "*.go"
rg -A5 -B0 "type Executor interface" -g "*.go"

Length of output: 92


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect package and imports in execution.go
head -n 20 execution.go

# Inspect package and imports in execution_test.go
head -n 20 execution_test.go

Length of output: 821


Critical: Interface mismatch in ExecuteTxs signature

  • The compile-time check at execution.go:32
    var _ execution.Executor = (*PureEngineClient)(nil)
    is failing because PureEngineClient.ExecuteTxs now has an extra metadata map[string]interface{} parameter that the Executor interface doesn’t define.
  • The tests in execution_test.go still call ExecuteTxs without the metadata argument, leading to further compilation errors.

Action items:
• Locate and update the execution.Executor interface (wherever it’s defined) to include the metadata map[string]interface{} parameter in the ExecuteTxs method signature.
• Update all call sites (including tests) to pass the new metadata argument, or remove the parameter entirely if it isn’t needed.
• Alternatively, revert the ExecuteTxs signature in PureEngineClient to match the existing interface if you decide not to introduce metadata.

Please verify that the Executor interface definition has been updated to match your implementation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint / golangci-lint

[failure] 32-32:
cannot use (*PureEngineClient)(nil) (value of type *PureEngineClient) as "github.com/rollkit/rollkit/core/execution".Executor value in variable declaration: *PureEngineClient does not implement "github.com/rollkit/rollkit/core/execution".Executor (wrong type for method ExecuteTxs)

🪛 GitHub Actions: CI and Release

[error] 32-32: vet: cannot use (*PureEngineClient)(nil) as Executor value: *PureEngineClient does not implement Executor interface (wrong type for method ExecuteTxs)

@tac0turtle
Copy link

This repo will be archived today can we move this to rollkit

@tac0turtle tac0turtle closed this May 30, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Evolve May 30, 2025
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Aug 25, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants