Skip to content

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8116
Describe changes:

  • quic: encryption-handling config parameters
  • udp: commit to allow app-layer such as quic to set bypass on parsing

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2819

#14494 complete no draft

as it is not specific to ssh anymore
as it is no longer specific to SSH
To move non-specific quic code to the right place
Ticket: 8116

quic parsing on udp can request bypass.
But such a bypass was only handled for TCP protocols in
AppLayerParserParse
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.75510% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.12%. Comparing base (af246ae) to head (b978a19).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14502      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.12%   82.12%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1013     1014       +1     
  Lines      262327   262358      +31     
==========================================
+ Hits       215439   215456      +17     
- Misses      46888    46902      +14     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 59.30% <55.10%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
livemode 18.74% <6.12%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pcap 44.63% <55.10%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 65.00% <89.58%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 59.25% <27.08%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

WARNING:

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPW2_autofp_stats_chk
.uptime 147 142 96.6%

Pipeline = 28827

if let Ok(eh) = EncryptionHandling::from_str(val) {
unsafe { ENCRYPTION_BYPASS_ENABLED = eh };
} else {
SCLogWarning!("Unknown value {} for quic.encryption-handling.", val);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we be strict here? It's a new setting so no reason to allow bad settings?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Going to LogError then

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Next version in #14509

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants