Skip to content

Conversation

@alexrichey
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@alexrichey alexrichey changed the title Ar pluto new fields 1893 PLUTO CoY Fields Dec 8, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.68%. Comparing base (569f9b6) to head (0fa57a1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@alexrichey alexrichey force-pushed the ar-pluto-new-fields-1893 branch 3 times, most recently from db078c1 to 7de5489 Compare December 8, 2025 22:43
@alexrichey alexrichey linked an issue Dec 10, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@alexrichey alexrichey force-pushed the ar-pluto-new-fields-1893 branch 5 times, most recently from ce6cd3a to 3079a14 Compare December 17, 2025 20:07
@alexrichey
Copy link
Contributor Author

WIP Comment

Questionable Splits

Overall, only 7 Lots are split between multiple MIH areas. Below are some odd cases

The following BBLs are split fairly evenly between two MIH Areas.

BBL: 3037050014
The southern MIH area covers 50.9% of the BBL... however, you can see that that property is in the northern MIH area
image


BBL: 1020130029
These are split between an Option 1 and 2 and Option 1 area for One45 Harlem for All
The winner is the MIH Area in the northwest (the top-left)
image


BBL: 2042260001
This is just sort of an odd case. This is PELHAM PARKWAY, and not that it matters terribly, but it probably shouldn't be in either MIH Area. However, it meets the threshold for both, with the slight winner being 1776 Eastchester Road - Option 2, which covers 21% of the lot.
image

@alexrichey alexrichey force-pushed the ar-pluto-new-fields-1893 branch from 3079a14 to b9d6271 Compare December 17, 2025 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CoY PLUTO fields

2 participants