Skip to content

Rigorous Research Methodology for Social Scientists and Market Researchers

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

vtmade/research-edge-series

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

16 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Research Edge Series

Rigorous Research Methodology for Social Scientists and Market Researchers

By Vinay Thakur

About the Series

The Research Edge Series provides evidence-based guidance for researchers who want to move beyond casual data collection to rigorous research practice. Each installment focuses on fundamental methodological challenges and their solutions, helping you avoid common pitfalls that destroy research validity.

Core Principles

Theoretical Rigor: Every recommendation is grounded in established research methodology • Practical Application: Complex concepts explained through real-world examples
Error Prevention: Focus on avoiding systematic biases that compound across studies • Actionable Insights: Move from "interesting findings" to strategic decisions

Article Index

Understanding Post-Hoc Rationalization in Consumer Research

Discover why consumers do not have conscious access to their decision-making processes and how post-hoc rationalization creates misleading research insights. Learn why direct "why" questions fail and how expert researchers use perception association methods to uncover real decision drivers.

Key Topics: • Post-hoc rationalization and System 1 vs System 2 thinking • Why direct questions about decision reasons fail • Perception association research techniques • Business impact of misunderstanding decision drivers

Available Formats: 📄 Article | 📁 PDF

Moving Beyond Casual Surveys to Rigorous Research Design

Learn why most research fails before data collection even begins. Discover the fundamental distinction between reflective and formative constructs, understand how measurement model misspecification can inflate your findings by 400%, and see how to fix the most common survey design errors.

Key Topics: • The consumer-as-researcher fallacy • Reflective vs. formative measurement models • Systematic bias in causal attribution • Step-by-step measurement design

Available Formats: 📄 Article | 📁 PDF

Why Statistical Precision Trumps Intuitive Mathematics

Contemporary business research suffers from a fundamental misunderstanding of statistical sampling theory, leading to systematic over-sampling and resource misallocation. Discover why population size bears minimal relationship to required sample sizes and how precision requirements should drive sampling decisions.

Key Topics: • The precision framework: Astronomical vs. engineering measurement standards • Mathematical reality vs. intuitive logic in population sampling • International research standards from WHO and UNICEF • Decision frameworks for optimal sample size determination

Available Formats: 📄 Article | 📁 PDF

Experimental Validation Using Real NYC Taxi Data

This supplementary article provides real-world experimental validation of the Sample Size Paradox using 1 million NYC taxi transactions. Demonstrates empirically how sample size affects estimate precision and validates the Central Limit Theorem through systematic sampling simulation.

Key Findings: • Dramatic accuracy improvements from n=30 to n=300 (6 percentage points precision gain) • Diminishing returns beyond n=500 samples • Statistical theory validated with 98% accuracy across all sample sizes • Visual demonstration of sampling variability through heatmap analysis

Supporting Materials: 🎯 Sampling Heatmap | 💻 Python Code | 📊 Data

Why Copying Successful Companies Usually Fails (And How Rigorous Research Fixes This)

Understand why most business advice misleads us by confusing correlation with causation. Learn the difference between anecdotal pattern-matching and rigorous causal analysis, including reverse causality, confounding variables, and how researchers use regression analysis and propensity score matching to establish probable cause.

Key Topics: • The halo effect and survivorship bias in business research • Three types of false causation: reverse causality, confounders, and pure correlation • Regression analysis and statistical controls explained • Propensity score matching: finding statistical twins • How to evaluate business advice critically

Available Formats: 📄 Article | 📁 PDF


Repository Structure

research-edge-series/
├── articles/           # Series articles in markdown format
├── assets/            # PDFs, images, diagrams, and supporting materials  
├── docs/              # Additional documentation and resources
└── README.md          # This file

How to Use This Repository

  1. Browse Articles: Each article is self-contained and addresses a specific methodological challenge
  2. Follow the Series: Articles build on each other but can be read independently
  3. Apply the Frameworks: Use the decision trees and checklists in your own research
  4. Share and Contribute: Reference these materials in your work and suggest improvements

Citation

When referencing articles from this series, please use:

Thakur, V. (2025). [Article Title]. Research Edge Series #[Number]. 
Retrieved from https://github.com/[username]/research-edge-series

Contact

For questions, feedback, or collaboration opportunities, connect with Vinay Thakur.

License

This content is designed for educational and professional development purposes. Please see individual articles for specific usage guidelines.


Research Edge Series - Transforming how we approach social & business research methodology.

About

Rigorous Research Methodology for Social Scientists and Market Researchers

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 2

  •  
  •  

Languages