Skip to content

[ci] feat: add npu nightly ci#5225

Open
daikang6 wants to merge 4 commits intoverl-project:mainfrom
daikang6:main
Open

[ci] feat: add npu nightly ci#5225
daikang6 wants to merge 4 commits intoverl-project:mainfrom
daikang6:main

Conversation

@daikang6
Copy link
Contributor

@daikang6 daikang6 commented Feb 7, 2026

What does this PR do?

Add concise overview of what this PR aims to achieve or accomplish. Reference related GitHub issues and PRs that help with the review.

Checklist Before Starting

  • Search for similar PRs. Paste at least one query link here: ...
  • Format the PR title as [{modules}] {type}: {description} (This will be checked by the CI)
    • {modules} include fsdp, megatron, veomni, sglang, vllm, rollout, trainer, ci, training_utils, recipe, hardware, deployment, ray, worker, single_controller, misc, perf, model, algo, env, tool, ckpt, doc, data, cfg, reward
    • If this PR involves multiple modules, separate them with , like [megatron, fsdp, doc]
    • {type} is in feat, fix, refactor, chore, test
    • If this PR breaks any API (CLI arguments, config, function signature, etc.), add [BREAKING] to the beginning of the title.
    • Example: [BREAKING][fsdp, megatron] feat: dynamic batching

Test

For changes that can not be tested by CI (e.g., algorithm implementation, new model support), validate by experiment(s) and show results like training curve plots, evaluation results, etc.

API and Usage Example

Demonstrate how the API changes if any, and provide usage example(s) if possible.

# Add code snippet or script demonstrating how to use this

Design & Code Changes

Demonstrate the high-level design if this PR is complex, and list the specific changes.

Checklist Before Submitting

Important

Please check all the following items before requesting a review, otherwise the reviewer might deprioritize this PR for review.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces two new shell scripts for nightly CI tests on NPU hardware, one for GRPO and one for PPO training. The scripts are well-structured for CI purposes. My review includes a couple of suggestions to improve clarity and correctness of the scripts by removing an unused variable, a confusing comment, and a redundant training parameter. These changes will make the new CI scripts more maintainable.

Comment on lines 3 to 6
ENGINE=${1:-vllm}

# Some models are optimized by vllm ascend. While in some case, e.g. rlhf training,
# the optimized model may not be suitable. In this case, set this value to 0 to disable the optimized model.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The ENGINE variable is initialized but never used in the script. The accompanying comment is also unclear as it refers to 'this value' without specifying what it is. This appears to be leftover code and should be removed to improve script clarity and maintainability.

Comment on lines 50 to 51
trainer.total_training_steps=15 \
trainer.total_epochs=15 $@ No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

You have specified both trainer.total_training_steps and trainer.total_epochs. The total_training_steps parameter usually takes precedence, making total_epochs redundant and potentially confusing. To avoid ambiguity and ensure the training duration is explicitly controlled by the number of steps, please remove trainer.total_epochs.

Suggested change
trainer.total_training_steps=15 \
trainer.total_epochs=15 $@
trainer.total_training_steps=15 $@

Comment on lines +3 to +6
ENGINE=${1:-vllm}

# Some models are optimized by vllm ascend. While in some case, e.g. rlhf training,
# the optimized model may not be suitable. In this case, set this value to 0 to disable the optimized model.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The ENGINE variable is initialized but never used in the script. The accompanying comment is also unclear as it refers to 'this value' without specifying what it is. This appears to be leftover code and should be removed to improve script clarity and maintainability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant