Merged
Conversation
* missing : tables, nested list styles, checklists
* faker v10 is not compatible with jest : https://v10.fakerjs.dev/guide/upgrading.html#incompatibility-with-jest
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #119 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.77% 79.16% -0.62%
==========================================
Files 96 98 +2
Lines 2294 2313 +19
Branches 409 412 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1830 1831 +1
+ Misses 380 355 -25
- Partials 84 127 +43 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
TeddyRoncin
commented
Mar 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original PR #99
Mise à jour des dépendances de l'api (basé sur
feat/lexical-generator)Faker v10 n'est pas compatible avec jest, il existe un workaround qui consiste à utiliser babel... Mais c'est un peu lourd pour les test, non ? Si on décide d'utiliser babel parce que jest ne supporte les packages pure-esm, on pourra réintroduire les tests unitaires de lexical (cf. #97)