Skip to content

Conversation

@hoangsinh0601
Copy link
Collaborator

@hoangsinh0601 hoangsinh0601 commented Sep 3, 2025

🚀 Description

🔄 Type of Change

  • feat: A new feature
  • 🐛 fix: A bug fix
  • 📚 docs: Documentation only changes
  • 🎨 style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • ♻️ refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • 🧪 test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
  • 🔧 build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • 🔄 ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts
  • 🏠 chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files

📝 Changes Made

🧪 Testing

  • Tests pass locally
  • New tests added for new functionality
  • Existing tests updated as needed
  • Manual testing completed

Test Results

📖 Documentation

  • README updated if needed
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
  • Code comments added/updated
  • API documentation updated

🔗 Related Issues

Fixes #
Closes #
Related to #

📸 Screenshots/Examples

✅ Checklist

  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

🎯 Focus Areas for Review

🚨 Breaking Changes

📝 Additional Notes


Please ensure all checks pass before requesting review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated Discord community invite link across README and contributing guides to the new, active URL.
    • Added “Share feedback and suggestions” to the Community section of the contributing guide.
  • Chores

    • Refreshed the Discord invite link in the release page footer, CLI help output, and startup banner.
    • Ensures all in-app and documentation links direct users to the current Discord community.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updated Discord invite URL across documentation, HTML, and CLI/banner output strings. Added a new “Share feedback and suggestions” bullet in CONTRIBUTING. No logic, control flow, or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Documentation links
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md, .github/README.md, .github/release-page.html
Replaced Discord invite URL https://discord.gg/BqTqZ46uT9 with https://discord.gg/BzNmrJ5xnC in multiple locations; added a new community bullet in CONTRIBUTING.
CLI/banner output
internal/cli/handlers.go, internal/utils/helpers.go
Updated displayed Discord URL in usage table and banner strings to the new invite link.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I twitch my ears at links anew,
A hop, a skip—the invite’s true.
In banners bright and docs we share,
One doorway now to bunny lair.
Come nibble notes and share your view,
Our burrow’s ready—waiting for you. 🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e126e58 and 896ef99.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/README.md (2 hunks)
  • .github/release-page.html (1 hunks)
  • internal/cli/handlers.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/utils/helpers.go (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch refactor/replace-discord-link

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ♻️ Refactor Code refactoring ❓ Needs Review Requires manual review and labeling labels Sep 3, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2025

🚨 Emergency Labeling Applied

This PR was automatically labeled as "❓ Needs Review" because no other labels could be applied.

Please:

  1. Update the PR title to follow conventional commit format
  2. Or manually apply appropriate labels

This ensures proper organization and searchability of PRs.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2025

✅ Commit Validation Passed

All commits follow the conventional commit format! 🎉

Thank you for following our commit standards. This helps with:

  • 📝 Automated changelog generation
  • 🏷️ Automatic PR labeling
  • 🚀 Better release notes
  • 📊 Project history tracking

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2025

🚨 Emergency Labeling Applied

This PR was automatically labeled as "❓ Needs Review" because no other labels could be applied.

Please:

  1. Update the PR title to follow conventional commit format
  2. Or manually apply appropriate labels

This ensures proper organization and searchability of PRs.

@hoangsinh0601 hoangsinh0601 merged commit 9b147d9 into develop Sep 3, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@tienld-0801 tienld-0801 deleted the refactor/replace-discord-link branch September 3, 2025 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

❓ Needs Review Requires manual review and labeling ♻️ Refactor Code refactoring

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants