Skip to content

Conversation

@robinkrahl
Copy link
Contributor

In the initial implementation, we had a config option to determine whether unknown fields should return an error. Based on the discussion in [0], I think it is better to just collect unexpected fields in the message type and let the user decide how to handle them.

[0] #13

In the initial implementation, we had a config option to determine
whether unknown fields should return an error.  Based on the discussion
in [0], I think it is better to just collect unexpected fields in the
message type and let the user decide how to handle them.

[0] stadelmanma#13
The name for unknown fields is just unknown_field_n, so it does not
provide any additional value.  Using a map instead of a vec makes it
easier to access the data.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants