Richtext: color handling #9996
Draft
Richtext: color handling #9996
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ogoffart
reviewed
Nov 7, 2025
Member
ogoffart
left a comment
ogoffart
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The general direction make sense
internal/core/Cargo.toml
Outdated
| tr = { workspace = true, optional = true } | ||
|
|
||
| webbrowser = { version = "1.0.6", optional = true } | ||
| htmlparser = "0.2.1" |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have that optional, depending on experimental-rich-text
expenses
force-pushed
the
richtext-colors
branch
from
13f7f51 to
40d14e6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Builds on top of #9981. Uses font tags with color attributes like @ogoffart suggested