Open
Conversation
459807e to
49d9301
Compare
0aba9e3 to
18ed685
Compare
0b5d821 to
422286d
Compare
a31566d to
6c2b1d2
Compare
b5de26e to
66670d4
Compare
594de26 to
44bd2e0
Compare
Member
Author
|
Any chance to get this merged? |
This also allows running the hash check on the image before accessing any other data from it. Signed-off-by: Axel Heider <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleaning up the code, so it becomes a bit more modular. Moving this out comes handy for further refactoring.
This also allows running the hash check on the image before accessing any other data from it.
The feature is enabled when compiling with
-DElfloaderHashInstructions="hash_sha". Is anybody using this actually?