Skip to content

remove ibraheemdev from review rotation#155303

Open
WaffleLapkin wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
WaffleLapkin:ibraheemdev
Open

remove ibraheemdev from review rotation#155303
WaffleLapkin wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
WaffleLapkin:ibraheemdev

Conversation

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ibraheemdev haven't reviewed any r-l/r PRs since October last year and has a backlog of 8 PRs at the moment of writing this.

@ibraheemdev thank you for the reviews that you have done in the past! feel free to re-add yourself once you have time for this again :)

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 14, 2026

triagebot.toml has been modified, there may have been changes to the review queue.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 14, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Fallback group: @Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu
  • @Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu expanded to Mark-Simulacrum, jieyouxu
  • Random selection from Mark-Simulacrum, jieyouxu

Comment on lines 1476 to 1483
libs = [
"@Mark-Simulacrum",
"@workingjubilee",
"@jhpratt",
"@tgross35",
"@thomcc",
"@ibraheemdev",
"@joboet",
]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fmease fmease Apr 14, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm surprised to see that T-libs doesn't use triagebot's review queue tracking. If they did, it would be as simple as PM'ing triagebot as ibraheemdev work set-team-rotation-mode libs off.

View changes since the review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this work as an override for what's in the file? I feel like I have used it in the past.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah the issue is that libs in triagebot.toml has very small overlap with t-libs. Otherwise we would remove it from the triagebot config file already.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any way to alias r? libs to libs+libs-api+libs-contributors? I think that would cover the available pool, then we just adjust rotations for anyone who isn't on it now.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps we should consider restructuring libs in the same way as compiler did. That is, have one "libs" team containing everybody and then more specific groups of people with, e.g.libs or libs-api fcp rights.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think @Amanieu may have mentioned that as a possibility at some point.

@ibraheemdev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry, I meant to do this myself a while ago! I'll add myself back once I have more time.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bors r+ rollup

It would be nice if this wasn't needed but for the time being, seems like this is thing to do.

Thanks @ibraheemdev!

View changes since this review

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 15, 2026

📌 Commit 0a0dc9e has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 15, 2026
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026
remove ibraheemdev from review rotation

@ibraheemdev haven't reviewed any r-l/r PRs since October last year and has a backlog of [8 PRs at the moment of writing this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+assignee%3Aibraheemdev+label%3AS-waiting-on-review).

@ibraheemdev thank you for the reviews that you have done in the past! feel free to re-add yourself once you have time for this again :)
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #154882 (Gate tuple const params behind `min_adt_const_params` feature)
 - #155259 (explicit-tail-calls: disable two tests on LoongArch)
 - #155293 (fix arch names in cfg pretty printer)
 - #155314 (`BorrowedBuf`: Update outdated safety comments in `set_init` users.)
 - #153469 (docs: clarify path search behavior in std::process::Command::new)
 - #154765 (Clarify ascii whitespace exclusion of vertical tab in the doc)
 - #155172 (Some small nits for supertrait_item_shadowing, and additional testing)
 - #155279 (Test/lexer unicode pattern white space)
 - #155280 (Tests for precise-capture through RPIT and TAIT)
 - #155301 (Delete unused `rustc_trait_selection` errors.)
 - #155303 (remove ibraheemdev from review rotation)
 - #155304 (remove PointeeParser)
 - #155319 (Remove dead diagnostic structs.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants