Clean up fuzzing #165
Merged
Clean up fuzzing #165
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Do you need more CPU to fuzz this atm? Happy to run it for a while. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Thanks @0xB10C , but to be honest, I am not sure yet. I have been hacking on this nix flake which I just posted over here. Been trying to find a maintainable way to set these up for long runs on my servers. I am pretty new to it all though, still don't really know much about corpus management and what not. Would appreciate any advice/feedback on it though! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Non functional change, just aligning with cargo-fuzz conventions which is helpful for a little nix module I use to run fuzzing in my homelab.