NEW: add filter controls for distribution vs additional#30
NEW: add filter controls for distribution vs additional#30gregcaporaso merged 7 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Deploying library with
|
| Latest commit: |
672f747
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://4d98a91b.library-b91.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://non-distro-priority.library-b91.pages.dev |
|
This looks good @ebolyen, thank you! One request on nomenclature - what do you think about using "Stand-alone" instead of "Additional", e.g., here:
I think "Stand-alone" will be more clear, and it's a term I think I've used in various places to describe non-distro-associated plugins, so I think it will align with language in papers, on the forum, etc. (I would suggest "Distribution-associated" instead of "Distribution" as well, but I'm guessing it's too long of a phrase - but "Distribution-associated" versus "stand-alone" feelings like what we're trying to capture here). Aside from this, good to go from my perspective - thanks again! |
|
That's a much better term, thanks @gregcaporaso! |
ebolyen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
per @gregcaporaso's review
ebolyen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
distribution-associated definitely looks too long. What about distro-associated?
I also tried in-distribution and from-distribution, but it felt awkward
|
@gregcaporaso, feel free to merge either with or without the second round of terms. |
Co-authored-by: Evan Bolyen <ebolyen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Bolyen <ebolyen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Bolyen <ebolyen@gmail.com>
|
Stand-alone v Distro-associated sounds great. Just applied those suggestions, and this is ready to go after the build is successful. Thanks @ebolyen! |

fixes #28