Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Jan 30, 2026

Review feedback questioned whether Solver::solve() should skip state transitions and empty grounding in non-solve modes (ground/rewrite/parse). The current implementation intentionally maintains uniform control flow regardless of AppMode.

Design Decision

The solve() method now:

  • Always calls ground({}) and transitions to State::solved
  • Maintains consistent state machine behavior across all modes
  • Returns appropriate handles (SolveHandleFixed or SolveHandleBackend) based on mode

This uniform approach was intentional per maintainer feedback - the same control flow/state transitions should occur in both solving and non-solving scenarios rather than special-casing mode checks.

No code changes required; this PR documents the design rationale.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update backend implementation for generic approach Clarify intended behavior: uniform control flow across all AppMode values Jan 30, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from rkaminsk January 30, 2026 08:54
@rkaminsk rkaminsk closed this Jan 30, 2026
@rkaminsk rkaminsk deleted the copilot/sub-pr-596 branch January 30, 2026 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants