Skip to content

Conversation

@honza
Copy link
Member

@honza honza commented Dec 9, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@honza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62125, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sgoveas

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

dtantsur commented Dec 9, 2025

/lgtm
/cc @zaneb

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from zaneb December 9, 2025 18:25
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2025
@sgoveas
Copy link

sgoveas commented Dec 9, 2025

/verified later @sgoveas

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sgoveas: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @sgoveas.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later @sgoveas

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

}

if p.Architecture != types.ArchitectureARM64 {
allErrs = append(allErrs, field.Invalid(poolFldPath.Child("architecture"), p.Architecture, "on multi-arch baremetal, compute must be arm64"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be less confusing if the message were something like "on baremetal with amd64 control plane, compute must be amd64 or arm64".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Dec 9, 2025

/test ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@zaneb: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test artifacts-images
/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-manifest-validation
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upi
/test e2e-azure-nat-gateway-single-zone
/test e2e-azure-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upi
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-openstack-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/test gofmt
/test golint
/test govet
/test images
/test integration-tests
/test integration-tests-nodejoiner
/test okd-scos-images
/test openstack-manifests
/test shellcheck
/test unit
/test verify-codegen
/test verify-deps
/test verify-vendor
/test yaml-lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test aws-private
/test azure-ovn-marketplace-images
/test azure-private
/test e2e-agent-4control-ipv4
/test e2e-agent-5control-ipv4
/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-appliance-diskimage
/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-iso-no-registry
/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-none-platform
/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv6-minimaliso
/test e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
/test e2e-agent-sno-ipv4-pxe
/test e2e-agent-sno-ipv6
/test e2e-agent-two-node-fencing-ipv4
/test e2e-aws-byo-subnet-role-security-groups
/test e2e-aws-custom-dns-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-default-config
/test e2e-aws-overlay-mtu-ovn-1200
/test e2e-aws-ovn-custom-iam-profile
/test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-heterogeneous
/test e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-proxy
/test e2e-aws-ovn-public-ipv4-pool
/test e2e-aws-ovn-public-ipv4-pool-disabled
/test e2e-aws-ovn-public-subnets
/test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-custom-security-groups
/test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-edge-zones
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-aws-upi-proxy
/test e2e-azure-custom-dns-techpreview
/test e2e-azure-default-config
/test e2e-azure-ovn-multidisk-techpreview
/test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
/test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
/test e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-azure-ovn-upi
/test e2e-azurestack
/test e2e-azurestack-upi
/test e2e-crc
/test e2e-external-aws
/test e2e-external-aws-ccm
/test e2e-gcp-custom-dns
/test e2e-gcp-custom-endpoints
/test e2e-gcp-default-config
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-heterogeneous
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn
/test e2e-gcp-secureboot
/test e2e-gcp-upgrade
/test e2e-gcp-upi-xpn
/test e2e-gcp-xpn-dedicated-dns-project
/test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
/test e2e-metal-assisted
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-swapped-hosts
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-virtualmedia
/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-arbiter
/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing
/test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
/test e2e-nutanix-ovn
/test e2e-openstack-ccpmso
/test e2e-openstack-ccpmso-zone
/test e2e-openstack-dualstack
/test e2e-openstack-dualstack-upi
/test e2e-openstack-externallb
/test e2e-openstack-nfv-intel
/test e2e-openstack-proxy
/test e2e-openstack-singlestackv6
/test e2e-powervs-capi-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-externallb-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-host-groups-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-vsphere-multi-vcenter-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-disk-setup-techpreview
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-hybrid-env
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-disk
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones-techpreview
/test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
/test gcp-custom-endpoints-proxy-wif
/test gcp-private
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/test okd-scos-e2e-vsphere-ovn

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-artifacts-images
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-e2e-aws-ovn
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-gofmt
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-golint
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-govet
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-okd-scos-e2e-vsphere-ovn
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-okd-scos-images
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-shellcheck
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-unit
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-verify-codegen
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-verify-deps
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-verify-vendor
pull-ci-openshift-installer-main-yaml-lint
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@honza honza force-pushed the baremetal-multi-arch branch from a163d67 to 5f377f6 Compare December 9, 2025 21:10
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2025
@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2025
@hroyrh
Copy link

hroyrh commented Dec 10, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2025
Copy link

@sgoveas sgoveas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/verified later @sgoveas

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sgoveas, zaneb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Dec 10, 2025

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Dec 10, 2025
@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Dec 10, 2025

/verified later @sgoveas

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@honza: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @sgoveas.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later @sgoveas

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@honza: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 8f88b34 into openshift:main Dec 10, 2025
16 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@honza: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62125: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

This pull request has the verified-later tag and will need to be manually moved to VERIFIED after testing. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62125 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-12-12-050937

@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jan 7, 2026

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@honza: new pull request created: #10198

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants