GOVERNANCE: Fix "motion to release" link target (to RELEASES.md)#23
Open
wking wants to merge 1 commit intoopencontainers:mainfrom
Open
GOVERNANCE: Fix "motion to release" link target (to RELEASES.md)#23wking wants to merge 1 commit intoopencontainers:mainfrom
wking wants to merge 1 commit intoopencontainers:mainfrom
Conversation
I'd garbled the old '#release-approval' target in c732cc2 (project-governance: Make voting more generic, 2016-06-24, opencontainers#15). Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
wking
force-pushed
the
release-approval-reference
branch
from
6110829 to
165eb10
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This, like #34, falls into the "trivial broken link" category. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd garbled the old '#release-approval' target in c732cc2 (#15).
I expect this is a small enough change that it doesn't need the full amendment procedure, but it can certainly go out to an all-OCI-maintainer vote if folks would rather do it that way ;).