Skip to content

Conversation

@zhangshun-123
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@peter-jerry-ye-code-review
Copy link

peter-jerry-ye-code-review bot commented Mar 24, 2025

‼️ This code review is generated by a bot. Please verify the content before trusting it.

The pull request appears to add test cases for the BytesReader implementation, specifically testing the read_char and peek_char functions. The tests cover various scenarios, including handling ASCII characters, surrogate pairs, and incomplete surrogate pairs.

Here are the review points:

💡 [Add documentation for test cases]
  • Category: Maintainability
  • Code Snippet: All test functions
  • Recommendation: Add a brief comment above each test function explaining what specific scenario it is testing.
  • Reasoning: While the test names are descriptive, adding comments can help future maintainers quickly understand the purpose of each test, especially for edge cases like surrogate pairs.
⚠️ [Potential bug in incomplete surrogate handling]
  • Category: Correctness
  • Code Snippet: inspect!(reader.read_char(), content="Some('')") and inspect!(reader.peek_char(), content="Some('')")
  • Recommendation: Verify that the replacement character '' is the expected behavior for incomplete surrogate pairs. If possible, handle the error more explicitly (e.g., return an error type).
  • Reasoning: The current implementation seems to replace incomplete surrogate pairs with a replacement character, but this behavior should be explicitly documented and tested. It would be better to handle such cases in a way that is consistent with the overall design of the codebase.
💡 [Consider adding more test cases]
  • Category: Maintainability
  • Code Snippet: All test functions
  • Recommendation: Consider adding more test cases, such as handling multi-byte characters, empty strings, and strings with mixed ASCII and non-ASCII characters.
  • Reasoning: The current test suite is good, but additional scenarios could ensure more comprehensive coverage. For example, testing a string with both ASCII and surrogate pair characters would be valuable.

Overall, the changes are well-thought-out and add valuable test coverage to the BytesReader implementation. The main improvement would be to add more documentation and ensure the handling of incomplete surrogate pairs is well-defined.

@xunyoyo xunyoyo merged commit e4ac354 into moonbit-community:main Mar 24, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants