Skip to content

Conversation

@Mansi-mParticle
Copy link
Contributor

Instructions

  1. PR target branch should be against main
  2. PR title name should follow this format: https://github.com/mParticle/mparticle-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/pr-title-check.yml
  3. PR branch prefix should follow this format: https://github.com/mParticle/mparticle-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/pr-branch-check-name.yml

Summary

  • This PR fixes the issue where the mediaContentId key was incorrectly mapped, and instead, the key's value was mapped in the segment summary event.

Testing Plan

  • Tested it with the sample app and here’s a screenshot of the live stream.
    Before Fix:
Screenshot 2025-05-23 at 12 21 44 PM

After Fix:
Screenshot 2025-05-23 at 12 22 51 PM

Reference Issue

Copy link
Member

@rmi22186 rmi22186 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test?

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@mmustafa-tse mmustafa-tse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Mansi-mParticle Mansi-mParticle merged commit dad43eb into main Jun 11, 2025
4 checks passed
@Mansi-mParticle Mansi-mParticle deleted the fix/SQDSDKS-7263-medicContentId-key branch June 11, 2025 21:35
mparticle-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
## [1.5.6](v1.5.5...v1.5.6) (2025-06-12)

### Bug Fixes

* Correct the mapping of the mediaContentId key in the segment summary event ([#72](#72)) ([dad43eb](dad43eb))
* handle ad_break_id key in the ad Summary event ([#71](#71)) ([228a831](228a831))
@mparticle-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.5.6 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants