Skip to content

Conversation

@chebbyChefNEQ
Copy link
Contributor

@chebbyChefNEQ chebbyChefNEQ commented Apr 24, 2025

lower to ubuntu 22.04 to get better glibc compatibility

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the Ubuntu version used in GitHub workflows to Ubuntu 20.04 to improve glibc compatibility. The key changes include:

  • Updating the "rust-clippy-fmt" job to use ubuntu-20.04.
  • Updating the "build-and-test-java" job to use ubuntu-20.04.
  • Updating the "linux-x86" job in the java-publish workflow to use ubuntu-20.04.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
.github/workflows/java.yml Changed two job environments from ubuntu-24.04 to ubuntu-20.04
.github/workflows/java-publish.yml Changed linux-x86 job environment from ubuntu-24.04 to ubuntu-20.04

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Apr 24, 2025
@chebbyChefNEQ chebbyChefNEQ changed the title chore: lower jvm glibc to 20.04 chore: lower jvm glibc to 22.04 Apr 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@westonpace westonpace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think to get to 20.04 we'd have to run a docker-based build (but that might not be too hard).

@jackye1995
Copy link
Contributor

Added docker build for java publishing in #3703, but that PR continues to use 24.04 for testing. The publishing workflow also uses 24.04 as the base runner and only uses docker to run the build steps in 20.04. We can continue to evaluate if we want to switch everything to 22.04 here.

@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the rmeng/jvm-glib branch December 5, 2025 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants