Skip to content

Conversation

@GGoetzelmann
Copy link

@GGoetzelmann GGoetzelmann commented Dec 17, 2025

Fix: package structure was changed, link to package is outdated and leads to 404

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Docker container URL formatting in README for improved readability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Walkthrough

A README.md link to a Docker container was updated, changing the URL from an encoded path format (base-repo%2Fbase-repo) to a simplified plain path (base-repo). This is a cosmetic documentation fix with no functional impact.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Link Fix
README.md
Updated Docker container URL in Markdown link from URL-encoded path to plain path format

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A link once tangled in percent signs,
Now hops freely, clean and bright—
The URL decoded, paths align,
A rabbit's fix makes docs just right! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Fix link to Docker images in README' directly matches the main change: correcting an outdated Docker container URL link in the README file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-readme

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 105e9e2 and 5bef3be.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 17)
  • GitHub Check: build (macOS-latest, 17)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java)

* [Getting Started & Documentation](https://kit-data-manager.github.io/webpage/base-repo/index.html)
* [API documentation](https://kit-data-manager.github.io/webpage/base-repo/documentation/api-docs.html)
* [Docker container](https://github.com/kit-data-manager/base-repo/pkgs/container/base-repo%2Fbase-repo)
* [Docker container](https://github.com/kit-data-manager/base-repo/pkgs/container/base-repo)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Verify the container link resolves after package structure changes.

The Docker container link has been updated to align with the simplified package structure. If this change addresses a previous 404 error on the old URL with the encoded path, verify the new URL is accessible.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 104, the Docker container URL may still point to an
outdated/encoded package path causing a 404; verify the new link resolves and
replace it if it doesn't. Open the current URL in a browser or use curl/httpie
to confirm a 200 response; if it fails, find the correct package container URL
in GitHub Packages for the kit-data-manager/base-repo repository and update the
markdown link to that exact URL, then commit the README change and re-check the
link.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants