Skip to content

Conversation

@ahgpt
Copy link
Collaborator

@ahgpt ahgpt commented Jan 19, 2026

No description provided.

@ahgpt ahgpt requested review from SzekiHou and rainsonGain January 19, 2026 07:40
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ahgpt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses parameter handling within the SerialLLMAgent's async_policy method. The changes ensure that sub-agents invoked by the serial agent receive the correct observation and context based on the current message and observation state. This improves the agent's ability to process information accurately and maintain proper contextual flow during complex interactions.

Highlights

  • Method Signature Update: The async_policy method in serial_llm_agent.py has been updated to accept an optional message: Message = None parameter, allowing for more flexible context passing.
  • Dynamic Observation Handling: The exec_agent call now includes logic to dynamically adjust the observation parameter. If observation.info is empty, observation.content is used as the primary observation for the sub-agent execution.
  • Context Source Change: The context argument passed to exec_agent has been changed from self.context to message.context, ensuring that the sub-agent operates within the context provided by the incoming message.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the async_policy method in serial_llm_agent.py, changing its signature and the way exec_agent is called. While the changes seem intended to pass more context, they introduce a critical bug. The new message parameter can be None, but its context attribute is accessed without a null check, which will cause an AttributeError. I've provided a comment with a code suggestion to fix this critical issue and also improve the code's readability.

Comment on lines +38 to +40
if not observation.info:
observation = observation.content
result = await exec_agent(observation, agent, message.context, sub_task=True)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This block has a critical issue and a readability concern:

  1. Critical Bug: The message parameter can be None (as per the signature on line 32), but message.context is used on line 40 without a null check. This will cause an AttributeError if message is not provided.
  2. Readability: The observation variable is conditionally reassigned to a different type (Any) within the loop. This makes the code harder to follow and maintain.

I suggest refactoring this block to address both points for robustness and clarity.

                if not message:
                    raise ValueError("A 'message' object with context is required for serial agent execution.")
                question = observation.content if not observation.info else observation
                result = await exec_agent(question, agent, message.context, sub_task=True)

@ahgpt ahgpt merged commit ceaa80e into main Jan 19, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants