feat(models): add missing User fields from Bot API 9.3 #248
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add HasMainWebApp and HasTopicsEnabled fields to the User model to match the complete Telegram Bot API specification. These fields are returned only in getMe responses and indicate: - has_main_web_app: whether the bot has a main Web App - has_topics_enabled: whether the bot has forum topic mode enabled in private chats
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds the missing fields from the Telegram Bot API User object to ensure full API compatibility with Bot API 9.3.
Changes
Added Fields
HasMainWebApp(has_main_web_app) - Indicates if the bot has a main Web App (returned only ingetMe)HasTopicsEnabled(has_topics_enabled) - Indicates if the bot has forum topic mode enabled in private chats (returned only ingetMe)API Reference
Breaking Changes
None - these are additive fields with
omitemptytags, so existing code will continue to work.Related