-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 763
add support for int64 pointer in tiled_matmul kernel #1346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add support for int64 pointer in tiled_matmul kernel #1346
Conversation
|
Hi @Maxon081102! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
lw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution. The change is very large, and this code is in best-effort maintenance, hence we can only accept changes if they don't add too much surface.
| pid = tl.program_id(0).to(tl.int64) | ||
| pid_k = tl.program_id(1).to(tl.int64) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect these are the only two lines that differ wrt the original version, is that so?
What is the downside of always casting to int64 in the original kernel? Did you observe some performance regression?
| # Decide whether 32-bit address arithmetic can overflow; if so, use int64-safe kernel | ||
| INT32_MAX = (1 << 31) - 1 | ||
| def _dim_or_zero(xs, i): | ||
| return xs[i] if len(xs) > i else 0 | ||
|
|
||
| use_int64 = False | ||
| for i in range(3): | ||
| Mi = max(0, _dim_or_zero(ms, i)) | ||
| Ni = max(0, _dim_or_zero(ns, i)) | ||
| Ki = max(0, _dim_or_zero(ks, i)) | ||
|
|
||
| # A offsets | ||
| a_row_term = max(0, Mi - 1) * int(strides_am[i]) | ||
| a_col_term = max(0, Ki - 1) * int(strides_ak[i]) | ||
| # B offsets | ||
| b_row_term = max(0, Ki - 1) * int(strides_bk[i]) | ||
| b_col_term = max(0, Ni - 1) * int(strides_bn[i]) | ||
| # C offsets | ||
| c_row_term = max(0, Mi - 1) * int(strides_cm[i]) | ||
| c_col_term = max(0, Ni - 1) * int(strides_cn[i]) | ||
|
|
||
| # Check per-term and per-address sums | ||
| if ( | ||
| a_row_term > INT32_MAX or a_col_term > INT32_MAX or | ||
| b_row_term > INT32_MAX or b_col_term > INT32_MAX or | ||
| c_row_term > INT32_MAX or c_col_term > INT32_MAX or | ||
| (a_row_term + a_col_term) > INT32_MAX or | ||
| (b_row_term + b_col_term) > INT32_MAX or | ||
| (c_row_term + c_col_term) > INT32_MAX | ||
| ): | ||
| use_int64 = True | ||
| break |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code can be simplified
What does this PR do?
Fixes runtime errors caused by pointer size mismatches in Triton kernels during very large matrix computations.
This PR introduces a new Triton kernel that uses int64 pointers and adds automatic kernel selection between the existing int32 kernel and the new int64 version.
The change ensures stable execution on long‑context LLM training tasks, preventing RuntimeError: Triton Error [CUDA]: an illegal memory access was encountered when matrix dimensions exceed int32 limits.