feat(readme): Add the chip models that this routine can be programmed… (AEGHB-1150)

[zhongchaoesp]

Description

Add the chip models that this routine can be programmed into to the readme file of the example.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[github-actions]

	Warnings
⚠️	Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR: the commit message "feat(readme): Add the chip models that this routine can be programmed into to the readme file of the example": summary appears to be too long Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips: follow Conventional Commits style correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers) TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).
⚠️	The source branch "Modify_readme" incorrect format: contains uppercase letters. This can cause troubles on case-insensitive file systems (macOS). Please rename your branch.

👋 Hello zhongchaoesp, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

---

Click to see more instructions ...

This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...

We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against cbf59e3

[YanKE01]

example下的readme很多都没更新，新出的带一致外设的芯片一般都能直接跑。所以这个Supported Targets还不能简单根据readme来，也要适当参考使用组件的idf_component.yml，一般组件更新及时一点。

[YanKE01]

pwm_audio组件没有限制芯片，底层是ledc，应该是所有芯片都支持，readme里面的硬件连接示意太老了，3年前写的了。