Skip to content

Conversation

@alainm23
Copy link
Member

@alainm23 alainm23 commented Dec 16, 2024

@alainm23 alainm23 marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 16:32
@alainm23 alainm23 requested a review from a team December 16, 2024 16:47
@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Dec 16, 2024

image
Works for me

@alainm23 alainm23 requested a review from danirabbit December 16, 2024 20:28
@alainm23
Copy link
Member Author

I just did my latest tests and it works as expected.

image

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Dec 18, 2024

For me the whole updates box changes width when the values are being updated. It happens when numbers change. The effect is the jumping width.

Copy link
Member

@ryonakano ryonakano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks awesome! I suggested some changes as a PR, would like you to take a look at #360.

ryonakano and others added 3 commits December 28, 2024 11:07
- Lessen scope
- Lessen coupling
- Rename the method to avoid confusion of the getter method
- Unify naming notation: "xxx_size_str" is stringfied data of "xxx_size"
@ryonakano
Copy link
Member

For me the whole updates box changes width when the values are being updated. It happens when numbers change. The effect is the jumping width.

@stsdc Has the above comment been fixed in #359 already?

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Jan 5, 2025

No, this PR was only for vertical changes.

For horizontal I proposed here in comments.

@alainm23
Copy link
Member Author

alainm23 commented Jan 6, 2025

No, this PR was only for vertical changes.

For horizontal I proposed here in comments.

Do you have a screenshot or any way to reproduce the bug?

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Jan 6, 2025

I have posted screenshots in the review.

@ryonakano
Copy link
Member

@stsdc I couldn't find any screenshots that look like showing the above issue in this PR, I'm sorry but could you post the screenshots again?

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Jan 8, 2025

Here is the original: #356 (comment)

The issue happens when label updates amount of downloaded bytes, and since numbers are not the same width, the whole container changes width a few pixels.
Here is an exaggerated situation:
obraz

And here I have added wrap property:
obraz

@alainm23 alainm23 requested a review from stsdc January 9, 2025 13:13
@alainm23 alainm23 requested a review from ryonakano January 9, 2025 13:13
@alainm23
Copy link
Member Author

alainm23 commented Jan 9, 2025

I just added the wrap property

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

stsdc commented Jan 9, 2025

LGTM ✅

Copy link
Member

@ryonakano ryonakano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 from me too. I'm also committing to this branch though 🙈

@stsdc stsdc merged commit b0752f7 into main Jan 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@stsdc stsdc deleted the alainm23/update_progress_indicator branch January 9, 2025 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Progress indicator when downloading updates

5 participants