Skip to content

Allow to ignore unsupported connection opts (1.3)#274

Merged
staticlibs merged 1 commit intoduckdb:v1.3-ossivalisfrom
staticlibs:unsupported_options_13
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Allow to ignore unsupported connection opts (1.3)#274
staticlibs merged 1 commit intoduckdb:v1.3-ossivalisfrom
staticlibs:unsupported_options_13

Conversation

@staticlibs
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a backport of the PR #250 to v1.3-ossivalis stable branch.

Currently driver performs strict checks on the user-specified connection options. If stray options are passed - exception is thrown on connect.

This is considered to be a good feature, to prevent accidental typos in option names. But in some cases user does not have full control over the options passed to driver by other tools.

This change adds new boolean connection property
jdbc_ignore_unsupported_options, when it is enabled - all unsupported connection options are ignored.

When used with external tools, it is intended to be set in connection string like this:

jdbc:duckdb:;jdbc_ignore_unsupported_options=true;

Testing: new test added.

Fixes: #232

This is a backport of the PR duckdb#250 to `v1.3-ossivalis` stable branch.

Currently driver performs strict checks on the user-specified connection
options. If stray options are passed - exception is thrown on connect.

This is considered to be a good feature, to prevent accidental typos in
option names. But in some cases user does not have full control over the
options passed to driver by other tools.

This change adds new boolean connection property
`jdbc_ignore_unsupported_options`, when it is enabled - all unsupported
connection options are ignored.

When used with external tools, it is intended to be set in connection
string like this:

```
jdbc:duckdb:;jdbc_ignore_unsupported_options=true;
```

Testing: new test added.

Fixes: duckdb#232
@staticlibs staticlibs merged commit 2cbc516 into duckdb:v1.3-ossivalis Jun 16, 2025
@staticlibs staticlibs deleted the unsupported_options_13 branch June 16, 2025 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant