Skip to content

Conversation

@radik878
Copy link

@radik878 radik878 commented Aug 26, 2025

  • adr-001: corrected "implemented" → "implement"
  • adr-002: clarified wording "via a OTP" → "via an OTP"
  • adr-003: fixed typo "Futher" → "Further"

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Polished Architecture Decision Records with minor grammar and spelling fixes to improve clarity and readability (verb tense, article usage, typographical errors).
    • Preserved original intent and examples; no functional or behavioral changes.
    • No impact to public APIs, user workflows, or configuration.
    • Enhances professionalism and comprehension of design documentation without altering any implementation details.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 26, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prism Ignored Ignored Preview Aug 26, 2025 11:35am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation-only changes: corrected minor grammar/typos across three ADR files (adr-001, adr-002, adr-003). No code, API, or behavioral modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
ADR docs grammar fixes
adr/adr-001-checkpoint-snarks.md, adr/adr-002-create-account-op.md, adr/adr-003-service-registration.md
Fixes: “implemented”→“implement” (adr-001), “a OTP”→“an OTP” (adr-002), “Futher”→“Further” (adr-003). Text-only; no logic/API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • distractedm1nd

Poem

A nibble of words, a hop through docs,
I trim the thorns from textual stalks.
“An OTP,” I twitch and grin—
Small fixes make the carrots win.
With lighter paws on ADR lanes,
I bound past typos, smooth the plains. 🥕✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
adr/adr-002-create-account-op.md (2)

9-9: Optional wording polish for readability.
Consider tightening the sentence and using an em dash and parenthetical example:

  • “centralizing account creation—… that they own a resource (e.g., a phone number) via OTP.”
    Also, “via OTP” reads a bit cleaner than “via an OTP.”
-The de facto solution to this problem is by centralizing the account creation - a service exists that signs off on an account creation event after a user verifies to the central entity that they own some resource, i.e. a phone number via an OTP.
+The de facto solution is to centralize account creation—an entity signs off on account creation after the user proves ownership of a resource (e.g., a phone number) via OTP.

5-5: IMT vs JMT terminology consistency across ADRs.
This ADR refers to “IMT”, while ADR-003 (Line 12) quotes ADR-002 with “JMT”. Please confirm which term is canonical and unify across ADRs to avoid confusion.

adr/adr-001-checkpoint-snarks.md (1)

259-259: Minor style: format method name and consider direct voice.
Wrap the method name in backticks and switch to an imperative tone for clarity.

-We also need to implement a find_and_verify_latest_checkpoint method to scan backwards from the current height to find and verify the latest checkpoint SNARK.
+Implement a `find_and_verify_latest_checkpoint` method to scan backward from the current height and verify the latest checkpoint SNARK.
adr/adr-003-service-registration.md (1)

93-93: Tighten sentence and code-format identifiers.
Consider backticks around identifiers and a small rephrase for flow.

-This differs from the existing implementation significantly, whose only account source is a SignedBySequencer. Further adjustments were made to AddKey and RevokeKey to enable hashchain verification using a SignatureBundle as originally intended.
+This differs significantly from the existing implementation, whose only account source is `SignedBySequencer`. Further adjustments were made to `AddKey` and `RevokeKey` to enable hashchain verification using a `SignatureBundle`, as originally intended.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82d6dfb and f6299a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • adr/adr-001-checkpoint-snarks.md (1 hunks)
  • adr/adr-002-create-account-op.md (1 hunks)
  • adr/adr-003-service-registration.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
adr/adr-002-create-account-op.md (1)

9-9: Good catch: “an OTP” is correct.
The article usage is now grammatically correct. No behavior/spec meaning changed.

adr/adr-001-checkpoint-snarks.md (1)

259-259: Grammar fix looks right.
“implement” (not “implemented”) matches the intent and aligns with the method defined below.

adr/adr-003-service-registration.md (1)

93-93: Typo fix confirmed.
“Further” is correct; the sentence reads properly now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant