added test case for secrityhub_enabled #316
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
This is a testcase for securityhub_enabled
Description
Refactored and corrected test cases for the securityhub_enabled check.
-Aligned structure, mocking, exception handling, and assertion style with the reference check iam_password_policy_lowercase.
-Ensured coverage for:
Security Hub enabled with valid ARN
Missing ARN in response
ResourceNotFoundException
InvalidAccessException
Generic ClientError
Checklist
-Documentation follows Google Python Style Guide
-Considered if backporting is needed
License
I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.