Skip to content

Conversation

@ajay-dhangar
Copy link
Member

Potential fix for https://github.com/codeharborhub/tutorial/security/code-scanning/5

In general, fix this by explicitly specifying a minimal permissions: block in the workflow or job so that the GITHUB_TOKEN is restricted to the least privileges required. Since this workflow only appears to read repository metadata and search issues via the GitHub API, read-only scopes for repository contents and issues are sufficient.

The best fix with minimal functional change is to add a permissions: block at the workflow root (top level, alongside name: and on:) so it applies to all jobs that omit their own permissions. For these steps, the token only needs to read repository contents and issues, so we can use:

permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: read

No existing steps need to be changed; the token will still authenticate successfully for the read-only API calls being made.

Specifically, in .github/workflows/pr_creation_workflow.yml, insert the permissions: block after the name: PR Creation Workflow line and before the on: block. No new methods, imports, or other definitions are required, since this is purely a workflow configuration change.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar marked this pull request as ready for review December 27, 2025 09:09
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job, @ajay-dhangar! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request to CodeHarborHub. We appreciate your contribution and enthusiasm! Our team will review it soon. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out. Thanks for contributing!

@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar merged commit e7b9acd into main Dec 27, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants