Skip to content

Conversation

@ajay-dhangar
Copy link
Member

Potential fix for https://github.com/codeharborhub/tutorial/security/code-scanning/4

In general, the fix is to explicitly declare a permissions block in the workflow or for the specific job so that the GITHUB_TOKEN is limited to the minimal rights required. This workflow only needs to read from the repository (and in fact mostly uses public search APIs and event payload data), so contents: read is an appropriate minimal starting point.

The best fix with no functional change is to add a top-level permissions section (so it applies to all jobs) specifying contents: read. This should be added just under the name: (or directly under on: if preferred), before the jobs: key. No changes are necessary to steps or commands, and no additional imports or tools are needed. The rest of the workflow continues to run as before, but with a more restricted token.

Specifically, edit .github/workflows/issue_creation_workflow.yml to insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

after line 2 (the blank line following name: Issue Creation Workflow).

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar marked this pull request as ready for review December 27, 2025 09:08
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job, @ajay-dhangar! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request to CodeHarborHub. We appreciate your contribution and enthusiasm! Our team will review it soon. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out. Thanks for contributing!

@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar merged commit 40b86f0 into main Dec 27, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants