Skip to content

Conversation

@Swatinem
Copy link
Contributor

@Swatinem Swatinem commented May 9, 2025

No description provided.

@Swatinem Swatinem self-assigned this May 9, 2025
@seer-by-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

seer-by-sentry bot commented May 9, 2025

✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

codecov-notifications bot commented May 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (e9bcc09) to head (f570648).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #134      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.24%   96.67%   +2.42%     
==========================================
  Files        1201     1631     +430     
  Lines       44721    90457   +45736     
  Branches     1425     1425              
==========================================
+ Hits        42149    87452   +45303     
- Misses       2266     2699     +433     
  Partials      306      306              
Flag Coverage Δ
apiunit 98.03% <ø> (+1.67%) ⬆️
shared-docker-uploader 88.40% <ø> (-0.62%) ⬇️
workerintegration 43.39% <ø> (-18.43%) ⬇️
workerunit 90.74% <ø> (-0.29%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented May 9, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #134 will not alter performance

Comparing swatinem/unignore-testcoverage (f570648) with main (e9bcc09)

Summary

✅ 9 untouched benchmarks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants