Skip to content

Conversation

@ajtowns
Copy link
Contributor

@ajtowns ajtowns commented Oct 18, 2025

I run get-data automatically to capture stale blocks on a pruned node, and was surprised to see that it grabbed block 914982 without any competing block at that height available. I think this is probably from the script happening to run between the header being received and the block being validated. This patch avoids adding an entry to the csv in that case.

@0xB10C
Copy link
Collaborator

0xB10C commented Oct 18, 2025

LGTM, ty!

@0xB10C 0xB10C merged commit d49a29e into bitcoin-data:master Oct 18, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants