Skip to content

Conversation

@mialeska
Copy link
Contributor

Update license year

PR Details

Related Issue Link:
How Has This Been Tested
Checklist
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@mialeska mialeska self-assigned this Jan 19, 2026
@mialeska mialeska added enhancement New feature or request java dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Jan 19, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Walkthrough

Updated copyright year from 2025 to 2026 in the LICENSE file. Updated Maven dependencies in pom.xml: jackson-databind from 2.19.2 to 2.20.1 and selenium-java from 4.39.0 to 4.40.0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Copyright Year Update
LICENSE
Copyright year bumped from 2025 to 2026 in Apache 2.0 license header
Dependency Version Bumps
pom.xml
jackson-databind: 2.19.2 → 2.20.1; selenium-java: 4.39.0 → 4.40.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A year hops forward, twenty-twenty-six,
Dependencies dance to their newest mixes,
Jackson grins and Selenium shines,
Maintenance done in record time,
Hop hooray for version lines! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2
❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title focuses on Selenium update to 4.40.0, but the PR description emphasizes license year update as primary change, creating misalignment with actual main change. Revise title to reflect the primary change (license year update) or clarify that Selenium update is the main focus if that was the intent.
Description check ⚠️ Warning Description includes title-level summary and partially completes checklist, but lacks critical required sections: no related issue link, no testing details, and incomplete checklist items. Add related issue link, describe testing methodology and environment, and complete all required checklist items with explanations.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-selenium-to-4.40.0

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@pom.xml`:
- Around line 119-123: The pom declares org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-java
with version 4.40.0 which isn't a released artifact and will break the build;
update the <version> for the dependency org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-java to
the latest stable (4.39.0) or, if you intentionally need a nightly, replace
4.40.0 with the exact nightly/snapshot coordinate (e.g., 4.40.0-nightly or
4.40.0-SNAPSHOT) and add the appropriate snapshot/nightly repository entry;
ensure you only modify the <version> element inside the selenium-java
<dependency>.

@mialeska mialeska merged commit e7d7566 into master Jan 19, 2026
6 checks passed
@mialeska mialeska deleted the update-selenium-to-4.40.0 branch January 19, 2026 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request java

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants