-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
📝 Document history of why this exists #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a "Why?" section to the README documenting historical context around controversies in the Ruby community related to RubyGems organization governance in 2025. The content is placed in a collapsible details section.
Changes:
- Adds a new "Why?" section with historical background about RubyGems governance disputes
- Includes multiple reference links to external sources documenting these events
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| | 📍 NOTE | | ||
| |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | ||
| | RubyGems (the [GitHub org][rubygems-org], not the website) [suffered][draper-security] a [hostile takeover][ellen-takeover] in September 2025. | | ||
| | Ultimately [4 maintainers][simi-removed] were [hard removed][martin-removed] and an reason has been given for only 1 of those, while 2 others resigned in protest. | |
Copilot
AI
Jan 18, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The text contains a grammatical error. The phrase "an reason has been given" should be "a reason has been given" - the article should be "a" not "an" before a word starting with a consonant sound.
| | Ultimately [4 maintainers][simi-removed] were [hard removed][martin-removed] and an reason has been given for only 1 of those, while 2 others resigned in protest. | | |
| | Ultimately [4 maintainers][simi-removed] were [hard removed][martin-removed] and a reason has been given for only 1 of those, while 2 others resigned in protest. | |
| | RubyGems (the [GitHub org][rubygems-org], not the website) [suffered][draper-security] a [hostile takeover][ellen-takeover] in September 2025. | | ||
| | Ultimately [4 maintainers][simi-removed] were [hard removed][martin-removed] and an reason has been given for only 1 of those, while 2 others resigned in protest. | | ||
| | It is a [complicated story][draper-takeover] which is difficult to [parse quickly][draper-lies]. | | ||
| | Simply put - there was active policy for adding or removing maintainers/owners of [rubygems][rubygems-maint-policy] and [bundler][bundler-maint-policy], and those [policies were not followed][policy-fail]. | |
Copilot
AI
Jan 18, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The text contains a grammatical error. The phrase "there was active policy" should be "there was an active policy" or "there were active policies" to be grammatically correct.
| | Simply put - there was active policy for adding or removing maintainers/owners of [rubygems][rubygems-maint-policy] and [bundler][bundler-maint-policy], and those [policies were not followed][policy-fail]. | | |
| | Simply put - there was an active policy for adding or removing maintainers/owners of [rubygems][rubygems-maint-policy] and [bundler][bundler-maint-policy], and those [policies were not followed][policy-fail]. | |
No description provided.