Skip to content

Comments

Stub new type handling to fix the SpecTec build#91

Merged
tlively merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-spectec-interpreter
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

Stub new type handling to fix the SpecTec build#91
tlively merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-spectec-interpreter

Conversation

@tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Jan 29, 2026

Update backend-interpreter/construct.ml to avoid compile errors in the
due to the changes to the type system in the reference interpreter. Stub
out most of the handling of new functionality and leave TODOs so we can
easily find the places to update later.

Update backend-interpreter/construct.ml to avoid compile errors in the
due to the changes to the type system in the reference interpreter. Stub
out most of the handling of new functionality and leave TODOs so we can
easily find the places to update later.
@tlively tlively requested a review from rossberg January 29, 2026 21:54
@tlively
Copy link
Member Author

tlively commented Jan 30, 2026

Unless you think the fix would be trivial, I'd like to ignore the SpecTec failure for now.

Copy link
Member

@rossberg rossberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah, that looks like the right move.

@tlively tlively merged commit f76e5ce into main Feb 2, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
@tlively tlively deleted the fix-spectec-interpreter branch February 3, 2026 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants