Skip to content

Conversation

@Eitot
Copy link
Contributor

@Eitot Eitot commented Jan 11, 2026

No description provided.

"application/atom+xml":
"application/atom+xml",
"application/feed+json",
"application/json":
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that application/json should require further validation, like application/xml does

As of version 1.1 of the specification (published August 2020): Clients
that parse HTML to discover feeds should prefer the `application/feed+json`
MIME type, while still falling back to accepting `application/json` too.

https://www.jsonfeed.org/2020/08/07/json-feed-version.html
@barijaona barijaona self-requested a review January 24, 2026 09:04
@Eitot Eitot merged commit 15f2543 into ViennaRSS:master Jan 25, 2026
2 checks passed
@Eitot Eitot deleted the feature/htmlparser branch January 25, 2026 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants