# Consumer Transparency Governance Standard (CTGS)
**Status:** Public governance standard (v1.0)
**Short Name:** CTGS
**Focus:** Consumer protection, transparency, and anti-recursive-harm design in tech and retail ecosystems.
This repository publishes the **Consumer Transparency Governance Standard (CTGS)** and supporting materials, including:
- The canonical standard text
- Implementation guidance
- Licensing terms (MIT)
- Hashes and notarization strategy for tamper-evident releases
CTGS is designed for **real-world use** by engineers, product teams, AI/data teams, lawyers, regulators, auditors, and consumer advocacy groups.
## 1. What CTGS is
The **Consumer Transparency Governance Standard (CTGS)** defines a governance framework to identify, limit, and document **recursive harm systems** in consumer-facing technology and services.
It focuses on patterns such as:
- Repeating setup / reset loops that never resolve the core problem
- Hidden ecosystem or account dependencies
- Compounding “fix” costs that exceed the original product value
- Opaque refund and dispute flows that capture monetary float
- AI recommenders that steer users into unstable, high-friction configurations
CTGS is **technology-neutral** and **jurisdiction-neutral**. It defines **minimum expectations** for transparency, consumer rights, and corporate obligations. Jurisdictions and organizations may go further, but not less.
## 2. Core documents in this repo
This repo is organized around a small set of core, hashable documents.
### 2.1 Top-level files
- **README.md** (this file)
High-level overview of CTGS, repository structure, and how to use the standard.
- **LICENSE** (MIT)
The MIT license under which this standard and its text are released. This allows broad reuse, modification, and integration into other governance tools and frameworks, subject to MIT terms.
- **Standard\_v1.0.md**
The **canonical specification** of CTGS v1.0, derived from the formal standard document.
- Defines terms (e.g., *Recursive Harm System*, *Fibonacci Failure Cycle*, *Compounding Cost Trap*, *Device-Ecosystem Lock*, *Behavioral Extraction*, *Float Capture*).
- Enumerates **consumer rights** and **corporate obligations**.
- Describes the **enforcement/conformance posture**, including cryptographic fingerprinting and public anchoring.
- Sets rules for **versioning, canon governance, and interpretation**.
- **HASHES.md**
A manifest of cryptographic hashes (e.g., SHA-256) for canonical files in this repo.
- Allows anyone to verify that local copies match the published canonical texts.
- Supports tamper-evidence and provenance tracking across forks and mirrors.
- **NOTARIZATION.md**
Documentation of CTGS notarization practices.
- Describes where and how hashes of canonical files have been **anchored** (e.g., blockchain entries, timestamp services, or other append-only public ledgers).
- Provides a reproducible way for third parties to confirm that a given hash was published at or before a specific time.
### 2.2 Supporting documents (recommended structure)
You may additionally include (and link from this README):
- **Implementation\_Notes\_v1.0.md**
Non-normative guidance for making CTGS operational inside organizations:
- Who should use CTGS
- Typical workflows (product design, AI governance, refunds, vendor integration, incident handling)
- Example scenarios
- Common pitfalls
- How CTGS relates to other standards and regulations
- **/docs/**
Optional folder for extended examples, case studies, and organization-specific mappings.
## 3. Who CTGS is for
CTGS is meant to be read and used by multiple roles:
- **Product & Engineering**
- Hardware, firmware, OS, app, and platform teams designing consumer systems.
- Goal: avoid embedding recursive harm patterns and hidden locks into shipped products.
- **UX & Documentation**
- Designers and writers responsible for setup flows, error messaging, FAQs, and support docs.
- Goal: make incompatibilities, limits, and edge conditions clear *before* consumers hit them.
- **Legal, Policy, Compliance**
- Teams that manage terms of service, refund policies, risk registers, and regulatory engagement.
- Goal: align disclosures and practices with CTGS rights and obligations.
- **AI / Data / Recommender Teams**
- Data scientists and ML engineers building ranking, recommendation, and targeting systems.
- Goal: ensure models do not steer users into known failure patterns or compounding cost traps.
- **Customer Support & Operations**
- Teams handling troubleshooting, escalation, and refunds.
- Goal: avoid reinforcing recursive harm loops or exploiting friction and delay.
- **External Stakeholders**
- Regulators, auditors, consumer advocacy organizations, journalists, and researchers.
- Goal: use CTGS as a reference framework for assessing ecosystem behavior.
## 4. Key concepts (short overview)
CTGS introduces a harm-pattern taxonomy designed to be specific enough for real governance:
- **Recursive Harm System**
Any configuration or ecosystem behavior that repeatedly returns a user to the same or similar state without resolving the underlying problem.
- **Fibonacci Failure Cycle (FFC)**
A **recursively escalating troubleshooting loop** where each attempt becomes more complex or burdensome than the last, yet still fails to fix the issue.
- **Compounding Cost Trap (CCT)**
A pattern where repeatedly trying to “fix” the issue leads to:
- Added hardware or accessory purchases
- Forced tier or plan upgrades
- Growing subscription stacks
Until total costs significantly exceed the original product’s value.
- **Device-Ecosystem Lock**
Basic advertised functionality secretly depends on a proprietary ecosystem, service, or account that was not clearly disclosed prior to purchase.
- **Behavioral Extraction**
Use of behavioral data primarily to optimize corporate revenue—rather than user clarity, stability, or safety.
- **Float Capture**
Structures that hold consumer funds during refunds/returns in ways that are opaque and longer than operationally necessary.
The standard then defines:
- **Consumer Rights** (e.g., compatibility disclosure, loop awareness, float transparency, recommender accountability, truthful configuration claims)
- **Corporate Obligations** (e.g., maintain trap-pattern datasets, surface incompatibilities early, prefer safer recommendations, share responsibility across vendors, provide fair refunds)
## 5. Typical usage & workflows
See Implementation\_Notes\_v1.0.md for detailed patterns. At a high level:
- **Product teams**
- Map configuration flows.
- Identify where Recursive Harm Systems or FFCs could emerge.
- Align marketing claims with actual compatibility data.
- **AI governance**
- Test recommenders to ensure they do not push known-incompatible products or cost traps.
- Use trap-pattern datasets as input signals for model constraints.
- **Support / operations**
- Rewrite scripts that send users through the same steps repeatedly with no diagnosis.
- Track refund timelines and friction points that may imply float capture strategies.
- **Compliance / legal**
- Ensure internal policies document CTGS-aligned rights and obligations.
- Integrate CTGS into risk registers and board-level reporting where relevant.
## 6. Hashing and notarization
CTGS is designed to be **tamper-evident**.
### 6.1 HASHES.md
HASHES.md provides cryptographic fingerprints (e.g., SHA-256) for canonical files such as:
- Standard\_v1.0.md
- Implementation\_Notes\_v1.0.md
- LICENSE
- Any other file designated as canonical in future versions
**Verification workflow:**
1. Download the repo or specific file(s).
2. Compute the hash locally (e.g., sha256sum Standard\_v1.0.md).
3. Compare your local hash to the entry in HASHES.md.
4. If they match, you have the same canonical text as originally published.
### 6.2 NOTARIZATION.md
NOTARIZATION.md documents how and where those hashes have been **anchored**, for example:
- Public blockchain transactions
- Time-stamping or notarization services
- Other append-only public records
This allows third parties to verify that:
- A given hash existed at or before a specific date/time.
- A later file claiming to be “Standard_v1.0” is either identical (same hash) or explicitly a revision (new version with new hash).
## 7. Versioning
The CTGS repository follows a simple, explicit versioning approach:
- **Canonical standard text:** captured in Standard\_vX.Y.md
- **Implementation notes:** captured in Implementation\_Notes\_vX.Y.md
- **Hash manifest:** updated in HASHES.md for each canonical version
- **Notarization record:** updated in NOTARIZATION.md when new anchors are published
Core rules:
- Once a version is declared canonical and its hash is published, the text is **not edited in place**.
- Any corrections, clarifications, or structural changes are published as **new versions** (e.g., v1.1, v2.0), with:
- A documented changelog
- Updated hashes
- Updated notarization entries as needed
## 8. How CTGS relates to other standards
CTGS is meant to be **compatible with** (not a replacement for):
- **Privacy / data protection frameworks**
CTGS focuses on behavior, configuration, and economic fairness, complementing privacy rules around data collection, consent, and security.
- **AI and algorithmic accountability standards**
CTGS provides a domain-specific lens on AI recommenders in consumer ecosystems, anchoring fairness in practical outcomes (e.g., no steering into known failure patterns).
- **Consumer protection and product safety regimes**
CTGS sharpens language and expectations for digital, networked, subscription, and cloud-linked products.
- **Digital identity and risk standards**
CTGS can run alongside identity/risk standards, adding a transparency and harm-pattern layer focused on how systems behave in consumer contexts.
Mappings to specific external standards and laws may be provided in /docs/ or future versions of the implementation notes.
## 9. Contributing & feedback
This repository is intended as a **public, governance-grade reference**.
- If you find ambiguities or gaps, open an issue describing:
- The scenario
- The section(s) involved
- Any proposed wording or structure improvements
- If you develop:
- Test suites
- Conformance checklists
- Disclosure templates
- Case studies or mappings to local law
you are encouraged to share them (subject to the repo’s contribution guidelines, if defined) so others can benefit.
## License
Non-commercial redistribution is allowed only as an unchanged copy. No derivatives. Commercial use (including sale/monetization) requires a separate paid license from the author.
See LICENSE.
*End of README for the Consumer Transparency Governance Standard (CTGS).*