CEDS documentation for SLCF #169
Conversation
znicholls
left a comment
znicholls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Super nice, thanks!
One other thought: if some of this information is a duplication of things already on the CEDS page, I think it would also be ok to have less information here and just point people to the underlying CEDS documentation rather than duplicating. Up to you
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
durack1
left a comment
durack1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be great to augment this with DOI links, so that an interested user can help themselves, rather than having to ask more questions, or spend an hour doing a fruitless google search that could be avoided
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeb Nicholls <[email protected]>
doi links added |
|
Added final fixes to get the CI passing in rhoesly#1 |
|
@znichollscr is this good to merge? |
No waiting on rhoesly#1 |
|
this is good to go! |
|
We need to merge this before the CI will pass here
rhoesly#1
…On Fri, Jan 3, 2025, 20:32 rhoesly ***@***.***> wrote:
this is good to go!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#169 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A3KEXH6QYMRIV7X6OBFGPRT2I3QWVAVCNFSM6AAAAABT5SIXPOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNRZG4YTQMRQGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Fix up line endings and other minor fixes
|
@znichollscr looks like we're off and running - want to merge? |
|
Ok the failing CR is due to the PR coming from a fork. One to sort out in future. |
4 participants
Add CEDS documentation for slcf and co2.