-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
[Java] [Spring] Support a custom declaration of x-setter-extra-annotation at codegen for unique arrays
#23522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
drewlakee
wants to merge
1
commit into
OpenAPITools:master
Choose a base branch
from
drewlakee:issue23520
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P2:
isSetSetterExtensionDeclaredonly checks extensions on the unaliased schema, so wrapper-levelx-setter-extra-annotationdeclarations (single-item allOf or $ref wrapper) are missed even though those extensions are later merged. This leaves the flag false and allows default setter annotations to overwrite user-defined ones.Prompt for AI agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, didn't get the point :/
X_SETTER_EXTRA_ANNOTATION could be inherited somehow?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@drewlakee I suggested checking both the unaliased schema and the "original" wrapper because of how
openapi-generatorhandles references and inheritance.In your example, if
nicknamesis defined directly as an array in a model, it works fine. However, consider a case where the extension is declared on a property that references another schema (the "wrapper" case):Inside
fromProperty, the generator first identifies the property. Then, at line 4080, it callsp = unaliasSchema(p). This replaces the property definition with the resolvedUniqueListschema.The logic you added at line 4058 checks
p.getExtensions(). Becausephas been resolved toUniqueList, it only sees extensions defined insideUniqueList. It misses the extension defined on the property inMyModel(which is stored in theoriginalvariable).Even though the extensions are merged into the
property.vendorExtensionsmap later in the method,property.isSetSetterExtensionDeclaredis calculated early. If that boolean remainsfalse,AbstractJavaCodegenwill proceed to add the default@JsonDeserialize(as = LinkedHashSet.class)annotation, potentially conflicting with the custom one you intended to use.Checking
originalensures that if a developer places the extension on the property usage rather than the global schema definition, it is still respected.Cubic's product documentation | AI review settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, now I got it, but don't think it could be an appropriate use-case.
It would be better to leave it for the maintainers to think about.