Skip to content

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7846

Describe changes:

  • adds gunzip transform
  • adds zlib_deflate transform (maybe we can find a better name)

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2882

}
}
}
let max_size = if let Some(val) = max_size_parsed {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should probably set a max for the max size here, to avoid bad rules. E.g. 1MiB or 8MiB or something.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, will add

Investigating why SV fails on 3 runners only (trying to reproduce locally)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.57764% with 20 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.11%. Comparing base (c333b28) to head (386b775).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14671      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.11%   82.11%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1011     1012       +1     
  Lines      262812   262973     +161     
==========================================
+ Hits       215812   215941     +129     
- Misses      47000    47032      +32     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 60.18% <21.47%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
livemode 18.73% <21.47%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
pcap 44.55% <21.47%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 65.31% <80.40%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unittests 59.26% <42.50%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #14674

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants