-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
[16.0][ADD] account_analytic_relation_filter #809
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 16.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[16.0][ADD] account_analytic_relation_filter #809
Conversation
0d2d05c to
3c14761
Compare
3c14761 to
8e4b355
Compare
kanda999
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code and functional review
8e4b355 to
a72c0c7
Compare
yostashiro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Name suggestion: account_analytic_relation_filter
yostashiro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review.
account_analytic_relation_filter/static/tests/test_analytic_distribution.esm.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
83728e4 to
3a35a2e
Compare
3a35a2e to
b4a47ec
Compare
|
@yostashiro @kanda999 I make some adjustments to work the filter even when we select the accounts from the search more... as well and some JS code improvements. |
@yostashiro I fixed it. |
yostashiro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. The JS error I reported doesn't seem to reproduce now.
|
This PR has the |
kanda999
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional review: it works as expected
|
@oca/account-analytic-maintainers |
8de3731 to
6344af2
Compare
|
My latest commit is to fix the crash that happened because our patch was still awaiting an RPC result (orm.call) after the component had already been destroyed (for example, when a UserError interrupted the form creation). When that happens, OWL raises “Component is destroyed”. |
|
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
kanda999
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional review: It’s still working on the production server.
6344af2 to
873e026
Compare





This module introduces a filter for the analytic_distribution field by establishing a relation between analytic accounts.
@qrtl QT5540