update test workflow to include current branch in semantic-release config #53
Conversation
Coverage report for
|
St.❔ |
Category | Percentage | Covered / Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 | Statements | 86.58% | 1135/1311 |
| 🟡 | Branches | 70.31% | 450/640 |
| 🟢 | Functions | 86.62% | 123/142 |
| 🟢 | Lines | 87.35% | 1119/1281 |
Test suite run success
276 tests passing in 31 suites.
Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 7392552
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the deploy-to-dev workflow to improve version extraction from semantic-release and enhances documentation for developers. The workflow now manually captures and parses semantic-release output instead of relying on the @semantic-release/exec plugin, and improves error messages with better diagnostics. Additionally, comprehensive development setup documentation has been added to the README, including Git hooks installation instructions and commit message format guidelines.
Key Changes:
- Refactored semantic-release version extraction to parse output directly instead of using the
@semantic-release/execplugin - Added comprehensive development setup documentation to README with Git hooks installation instructions and conventional commit format guidelines
- Enhanced error messages in the workflow with more detailed diagnostics and commit history output
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Added detailed development setup section documenting Git hooks installation and conventional commit message format requirements |
| .github/workflows/deploy-to-dev.yaml | Refactored version extraction logic to parse semantic-release output directly and improved error messaging with diagnostic information |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
🔒 CodeQL Security Analysis ResultsCodeQL analysis has been completed for this pull request. Language: javascript 📊 View detailed results: Check the Security tab for complete findings. 💡 Next steps:
This comment was generated automatically by CodeQL Analysis |
1 participant
No description provided.