Rename Python package from autopr to codeflow_engine and add Architecture Decision Records#98
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
Codacy's Analysis Summary0 new issue (≤ 0 issue) Review Pull Request in Codacy →
|
Codacy's Analysis Summary100 new issues (≤ 0 issue) Review Pull Request in Codacy →
|
…ow_engine Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
|
@copilot ADD DOCS ON ALL ADR'S WE NEVER CREATED. SOME TECH CHOICES MIGHT BE DIFFERENT WHEN WE CONSIDER IT IN DEFAULT, THEN INCLUDE A SHORT MIGRATION SUMMARY IN THE ADR. also add an adr on repo structure, planning to split itinto at least v3 repos, but evluat eit with a full adr |
… structure - ADR-0019: Python-Only Architecture (supersedes ADR-0001) - Documents actual implementation vs proposed hybrid C#/Python - Includes migration summary and rationale - Details tech stack: Python 3.12+, FastAPI, PostgreSQL, Redis - ADR-0020: Package Naming Convention (codeflow_engine) - Documents autopr → codeflow_engine rename - Includes migration guide and backward compatibility - Explains dual naming (CLI vs package) - ADR-0021: Repository Structure and Multi-Repo Strategy - Evaluates monorepo vs splitting into 3-4 repos - Recommends split: core, ui, infrastructure, templates - Includes detailed implementation plan and timeline - Updated ADR-0001 and ADR-0002 status to superseded/deprecated - Added comprehensive ADR index/README for navigation Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Added comprehensive ADRs in commit 38829af: ADR-0019: Python-Only Architecture - Documents the actual Python-only implementation and explains why the originally proposed hybrid C#/Python architecture (ADR-0001) was not pursued. Includes detailed tech stack (Python 3.12+, FastAPI, PostgreSQL, Redis) and migration summary. ADR-0020: Package Naming Convention - Documents the ADR-0021: Repository Structure - Full evaluation of monorepo vs multi-repo strategy with recommendation to split into 3-4 focused repositories (core engine, UI, infrastructure, templates). Includes detailed implementation plan with 12-week timeline, coordination strategy, and success metrics. Also updated ADR-0001 and ADR-0002 to mark them as superseded/deprecated, and created a comprehensive ADR index (docs/adr/README.md) for easy navigation of all 21 architecture decisions. |
|
@copilot you didnt even consider rust. sure python only is the best option. consider separat. and no c#? consider separation of concens etc |
… of concerns - Added comprehensive alternatives evaluation section comparing: * Python-only (chosen) * Rust for performance-critical components (PyO3/maturin) * C# (.NET 8+) hybrid architecture * Go for microservices * Polyglot microservices approach - Each option includes: * Technology stack details * Pros and cons analysis * Separation of concerns strategy * Decision rationale - Added detailed "Separation of Concerns in Python" section showing: * Layered architecture (domain, application, infrastructure layers) * Domain-Driven Design principles (bounded contexts, dependency inversion) * Plugin architecture for extensibility * Repository and service patterns * Module independence and microservices-ready design - Expanded migration path with 4 detailed options: * Option A: Gradual Python optimization (Cython, PyPy) * Option B: Rust extensions via PyO3 (recommended for CPU-bound work) * Option C: C# microservices (for complex business logic) * Option D: Full polyglot microservices - Added decision tree for migration path selection - Included concrete Rust integration example with code samples - Explained why Rust is preferred over C#/Go for performance extensions - Added references for Rust, C#, Go, and architecture patterns - Demonstrated that separation of concerns is achieved through design patterns, not just language choice Co-authored-by: JustAGhosT <[email protected]>
Expanded ADR-0019 in commit 1b28109 to include comprehensive evaluation of alternatives: Rust (Option 2): Full evaluation of Rust + Python hybrid via PyO3/maturin, including performance benefits, memory safety, and concrete migration path with code examples. Identified as the recommended path for CPU-bound optimization. C# (Option 3): Complete assessment of C# (.NET 8+) hybrid architecture, including pros/cons and why it wasn't chosen despite being proposed in ADR-0001. Go (Option 4): Evaluated Go for microservices approach. Separation of Concerns: Added detailed section demonstrating how Python-only achieves this through:
The ADR now includes a decision tree for choosing migration paths and explains that separation of concerns is achieved through software design patterns, not language choice. Rust is positioned as the preferred option for performance-critical extensions when needed. |
| Proposed | ||
| **Deprecated** (Related to ADR-0001 which was superseded) | ||
|
|
||
| This ADR was proposed for cross-language communication in a hybrid C#/Python architecture, but was never implemented. The project uses Python-only architecture (see [ADR-0019](0019-python-only-architecture.md)), eliminating the need for cross-language communication. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 266
| @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ The file splitter is included with the AutoPR system. No additional installation | |||
| ## Quick Start | |||
|
|
|||
| ```python | |||
| from autopr.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
| from autopr.ai.core.providers.manager import LLMProviderManager | |||
| from codeflow_engine.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 92
|
|
||
| ### Error Handling & Reliability | ||
|
|
||
| - [ADR-0009: Error Handling Strategy](0009-error-handling-strategy.md) - **Status: Accepted** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 93
|
|
||
| ### Data & Deployment | ||
|
|
||
| - [ADR-0011: Data Persistence Strategy](0011-data-persistence-strategy.md) - **Status: Accepted** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 97
| - Clone time: Under 2 minutes for any single repo | ||
| - Test execution: Under 10 minutes for affected tests | ||
| - Release frequency: Each component can release independently | ||
| - Developer onboarding: New developers can work on single component without full codebase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 89
|
|
||
| ## References | ||
|
|
||
| - Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: https://monorepo.tools/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Bare URL used
| - Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: https://monorepo.tools/ | |
| - Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: <https://monorepo.tools/> |
| - Smallest repositories | ||
|
|
||
| **Cons:** | ||
| - Coordination nightmare |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
| - Coordination nightmare | |
| - Coordination nightmare |
|
|
||
| - **Python Package**: `codeflow_engine` (snake_case for Python convention) | ||
| - **PyPI Distribution**: `codeflow-engine` (kebab-case for package managers) | ||
| - **CLI Tools**: `autopr`, `autopr-server`, `autopr-worker`, `autopr-migration` (maintained for backward compatibility) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 119
| @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ The AI Enhanced File Splitter is a sophisticated tool that intelligently splits | |||
| ### Basic Usage | |||
|
|
|||
| ```python | |||
| from autopr.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
| from autopr.ai.core.providers.manager import LLMProviderManager | |||
| from codeflow_engine.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 92
|
|
||
| - PEP 8 - Style Guide for Python Code: https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/ | ||
| - Python Packaging User Guide: https://packaging.python.org/ | ||
| - Semantic Versioning: https://semver.org/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Bare URL used
| - Semantic Versioning: https://semver.org/ | |
| - Semantic Versioning: <https://semver.org/> |
|
|
||
| ## What is an ADR? | ||
|
|
||
| An Architecture Decision Record (ADR) captures an important architectural decision made along with its context and consequences. ADRs help teams: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 145
|
|
||
| ## Recommendation | ||
|
|
||
| **Choose Option 2**: Split into 3-4 core repositories for optimal balance between independence and coordination. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 112
| └── workspace.json | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| **Decision**: Not chosen because it doesn't solve clone size, access control, or technology heterogeneity issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 113
| - **PyPI Distribution**: `codeflow-engine` (kebab-case for package managers) | ||
| - **CLI Tools**: `autopr`, `autopr-server`, `autopr-worker`, `autopr-migration` (maintained for backward compatibility) | ||
| - **Configuration Files**: `autopr.yaml`, `autopr.yml` (maintained for backward compatibility) | ||
| - **Plugin Namespaces**: `autopr.actions`, `autopr.integrations`, `autopr.llm_providers` (maintained for backward compatibility) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 128
| ### Technology Stack (As Implemented) | ||
|
|
||
| The project uses a **Python-only architecture** (ADR-0019): | ||
| - Python 3.12+ with type hints and Pydantic v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
| - Python 3.12+ with type hints and Pydantic v2 | |
| - Python 3.12+ with type hints and Pydantic v2 |
| ### Shared Tooling | ||
|
|
||
| Maintain shared configurations in a `codeflow-shared` repository: | ||
| - Linting configs (ESLint, Ruff, Prettier) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
| - Linting configs (ESLint, Ruff, Prettier) | |
| - Linting configs (ESLint, Ruff, Prettier) |
| ## References | ||
|
|
||
| - Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: https://monorepo.tools/ | ||
| - Google's Monorepo Experience: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stores-billions-of-lines-of-code-in-a-single-repository/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Bare URL used
| - Google's Monorepo Experience: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stores-billions-of-lines-of-code-in-a-single-repository/ | |
| - Google's Monorepo Experience: <https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stores-billions-of-lines-of-code-in-a-single-repository/> |
|
|
||
| ### Current Repository Structure | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
| Split into many small, focused repositories. | ||
|
|
||
| **Proposed Structure:** | ||
| - codeflow-engine-core |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
| - codeflow-engine-core | |
| - codeflow-engine-core |
|
|
||
| ## Context | ||
|
|
||
| The codeflow-engine project has grown significantly and now encompasses multiple distinct concerns: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 99
| ### Rationale | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **Clear Boundaries**: The proposed split aligns with natural team and technology boundaries | ||
| 2. **Manageable Complexity**: 3-4 repos is manageable without excessive coordination overhead |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 93
|
|
||
| ### Core Architecture | ||
|
|
||
| - [ADR-0001: Hybrid C#/Python Architecture](0001-hybrid-csharp-python-architecture.md) - **Status: Superseded by ADR-0019** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 123
|
|
||
| - Monorepo vs Multi-Repo: https://monorepo.tools/ | ||
| - Google's Monorepo Experience: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stores-billions-of-lines-of-code-in-a-single-repository/ | ||
| - Git Filter-Repo: https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy has a fix for the issue: Bare URL used
| - Git Filter-Repo: https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo | |
| - Git Filter-Repo: <https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo> |
| - **Supersedes ADR-0001**: Documents the actual Python-only implementation | ||
| - Includes migration summary explaining why hybrid approach wasn't implemented | ||
|
|
||
| - [ADR-0021: Repository Structure and Monorepo vs Multi-Repo](0021-repository-structure.md) - **Status: Proposed** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 114
| @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ preserve_imports: bool = True # Preserve import statements in all compon | |||
| ### Basic Usage | |||
|
|
|||
| ```python | |||
| from autopr.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
| from codeflow_engine.actions.ai_linting_fixer.file_splitter import FileSplitter, SplitConfig | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codacy found an issue: Expected: 80; Actual: 92
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Renamed the Python package from
autoprtocodeflow_enginethroughout the codebase to align with the project's naming conventions, and added comprehensive Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document key technology choices.Changes
Package Structure
autopr/directory tocodeflow_engine/pyproject.toml: package declaration, entry points, plugins, coverage paths, isort configsetup.py: entry points and package dataImport Refactoring
from autopr.*→from codeflow_engine.*Code Example
Architecture Decision Records Added
Created comprehensive ADRs to document architecture decisions that were never formally recorded:
ADR-0019: Python-Only Architecture - Documents the actual Python-only implementation with comprehensive evaluation of alternatives including Rust (via PyO3/maturin for performance-critical components), C# (.NET 8+ hybrid architecture), Go (for microservices), and polyglot approaches. Includes detailed separation of concerns strategies, migration paths with decision tree, and concrete code examples. Explains why Python-only was chosen and how to migrate to Rust when performance optimization is needed.
ADR-0020: Package Naming Convention - Documents the
autopr→codeflow_enginerename with complete migration guide, backward compatibility strategy, and rationale for the dual naming approach (CLI vs package).ADR-0021: Repository Structure - Full evaluation of monorepo vs multi-repo strategy with recommendation to split into 3-4 focused repositories (core engine, UI, infrastructure, templates). Includes detailed 12-week implementation plan, coordination strategy, and success metrics.
ADR Index - Created comprehensive navigation guide (
docs/adr/README.md) for all 21 architecture decisions with status tracking and quick reference.Updated Status - Marked ADR-0001 (Hybrid C#/Python Architecture) as superseded and ADR-0002 (gRPC Communication) as deprecated to reflect actual implementation.
Separation of Concerns
ADR-0019 demonstrates how separation of concerns is achieved in the Python-only architecture through:
autopr.*plugin namespacesBackward Compatibility
autopr.yaml/autopr.ymlautopr.actions,autopr.integrations, etc.)Original prompt
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.