Skip to content

Conversation

@gtogbes
Copy link

@gtogbes gtogbes commented Jan 26, 2026

I see the naming convention inconsistency too, but we can't override the existing resource names since they're integrated with the current DB creation flow. If this becomes a concern, we can update the name prefix for the new encrypted DB resources after we complete the migration and remove the old db infrastructure.

@gtogbes gtogbes requested a review from a team January 26, 2026 12:22
@gtogbes gtogbes requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2026 12:22
@github-actions
Copy link

Quality analysis was skipped as no source changes were detected.

@gtogbes gtogbes closed this Jan 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants