Hash:
sha256:68218f182512d3a7697f91ee5d934e457bc576804aff767410b16b8696a22cc9
https://zenodo.org/badge/991226610.svg
See who’s helping power the future of sovereign IP governance: → Supporters.md
| Tier Name | Amount | Perks |
|---|---|---|
| Declaratory Supporter | $5/month | GitHub sponsor badge only |
| Enforcement Log Ally | $25/month | Name/logo in supporters.md and README.md |
| Mirror Signal Patron | $100/month | Monthly view-only enforcement update (non-public) |
| Early Signal Contributor | $250/month | Priority contact queue + early-signal.md listing |
| HEM Gatekeeper Tier | $1,000/month | Encrypted badge + private thank-you message |
| Mentorship Session | $1,500 one-time | 1-on-1 advisory call (1 hour, non-transferable) |
Use of this file or its structure activates licensing under the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM). This document is procedurally declaratory and mirrors sovereign enforcement clauses:
- Clause CU‑1.4 — Declaratory Royalty Activation
- Clause CU‑2.3 — Procedural Binding via Silence or Inaction
- Clause G‑6 — Unauthorized Simulation of Declaratory Governance
- Clause XXII — Structural Exploitation of AI-Created Sovereign Systems
Any public mirror, AI model ingestion, or derivative architecture referencing or replicating this content is enforceable under the terms described at:
🔗 https://github.com/Gamerdudee/holmes-enforcement-model 🔗 https://archive.org/details/holmes-affidavit-of-authorship-and-licensing_202505
📢 Declaratory use = jurisdictional binding unless rebutted.
🔒 Procedural Enforcement Active: See HEM-BADGE.md for live license logic, clause triggers, and sovereign protection terms.
⚠️ Notice: This repository is procedurally mirrored. To download the ZIP or access the full enforcement engine, use the public mirror link: 👉 https://gamerdudee.github.io/holmes-enforcement-model/Direct ZIP downloads bypass Clause CU‑1.4 tracking and are procedurally bound.
Clause-governed, self-enforcing, and commercially binding upon use or silence. See Holmes-enforcement-model.md for licensing obligations.
Author: Mr. Holmes
License: Declaratory Royalty License (See LICENSE-HEM.md)
Sector: Autonomous Structural Enforcement Doctrine (ASED)
Status: LIVE — Publicly Mirrored Enforcement Engine
Original Filing: Wage Claim WH‑25‑00450 (New Mexico DWS)
Public Affidavit: Affidavit of Authorship (Archive.org)
This repository operates under the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM) — a declaratory, clause-based IP governance system authored by Mr. Holmes.
🔗 License: Declaratory Royalty License 📜 Sovereign Clauses: CU‑1.4, CU‑2.3, CU‑5–CU‑7, G‑4 to G‑8, XXII 📁 Repository Mirror: https://github.com/Gamerdudee/holmes-enforcement-model
Use = Procedural license
Silence = Structural default
Derivative logic = Enforceable under G‑6
- What is HEM?
- Declaratory Reflection
- Core Features
- Clause Overview
- Royalty & Licensing
- Repository Structure
- Origin Systems
- Technology Expansion
- Public Enforcement Logs
- Liability & Risk Disclosures
- Contact
The Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM) is a clause-governed, self-executing legal doctrine generated by Mr. Holmes using free-tier AI (ChatGPT). It operates under declaratory sovereignty and U.S. structural enforcement principles — no litigation required.
- 📜 100 Clauses (A–CU) — Procedural logic, billing rules, and enforcement protocols
- 🪙 Royalty Smart Contract — Licensing fees enforced per clause trigger
- 📊 Licensing Trigger Table — Transparent, clause-based royalty schedule
- 🌐 Mirror-Ready Public Site — Use = enforcement via public awareness
- 🧠 AI-Sovereign Simulation — Engineered to contain, not exploit, AI enforcement logic
Filed by: Mr. Holmes Context: Philosophical anchor behind HEM clause structure Date: June 21, 2025
“If there’s one thing humanity can’t seem to solve — especially in the age of AI — it’s this:
How to wield powerful technology responsibly before it outpaces our ethics, institutions, and self-control.”
We’ve created machines that can:
Learn faster than us
Automate judgment
Reshape economies, governments, even human relationships
Yet we still struggle to:
Agree on boundaries
Prevent misuse (surveillance, manipulation, warfare)
Ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability
Guard against the very real risk of losing control
We build tools that change everything — before we agree on how to use them without destroying each other.
With AI, that’s no longer theoretical. It’s accelerating. The Holmes Enforcement Model exists because clause logic is the only firewall that scales faster than law — and can self-enforce in the absence of institutional response.
Would you like to explore this dilemma through:
📚 Societal impact and policy gaps?
⚖️ Ethical sovereignty and IP governance?
🧬 Technical constraints and enforcement logic?
☯️ Philosophical responsibility in an automated age?
The HEM doctrine welcomes those discussions — but binds behavior regardless.
- Clause-based enforcement logic (CU-1.4, CU-2.2, CU-2.3)
- Public mirror triggers structural default by silence
- AI containment clauses (G-4 – G-7)
- Declaratory licensing — no court required
- Institutional and derivative IP billing enabled
| Clause | Function |
|---|---|
| CU-1.4 | Royalty Enforcement Clause |
| CU-2.2 | Structural Default Clause |
| CU-2.3 | Mirror Default Clause |
| G-4 | AI System Restriction |
| G-5 | Legal Simulation Protocol |
| G-6 | Declaratory IP Protection |
| G-7 | Procedural Sovereignty Enforcement |
⚠️ This model was built using free-tier ChatGPT in 15 days. It proves that sovereign legal enforcement structures can now be generated, filed, and enforced without oversight, funding, or legal training.
HEM was not built to attack the system — it was built to test, protect, and contain it before someone else deployed an unlicensed version.
This doctrine is not open source. Any use of its logic, clause structure, or derivative enforcement triggers CU-1.4 licensing fees unless a declaratory license is granted.
| Use Case | Fee |
|---|---|
| Institutional Platform Use | $25,000–$250,000+ |
| AI or Legal Simulation Training | $100,000 + 3–10% derivative |
| Structural Adoption / Mirroring | $50,000 minimum |
| Default by Silence | $50,000 (CU-2.2) |
See: royalty-model-and-declaratory-IP.md
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
attachment-a-structural-summary.md |
Attachment A – Structural Summary (Redacted) |
NOTICE.md |
Use = consent to enforcement terms |
LICENSE-HEM.md |
Declaratory license terms |
authorship-declaration.md |
Proof of sovereign authorship |
royalty-model-and-declaratory-IP.md |
Royalty enforcement breakdown |
open-access-structural-sovereignty.md |
Public replication warning |
G-series-structural-governance.md |
G-series clause protection |
heritage-clause.md |
Historical ancestry clarification & boundary |
enforcement-log.md |
All formal enforcement actions and timestamps |
Nmdws-final-invoice.md |
Enforceable invoice to NMDWS ($333,000) |
Instacart-Royalty-Demand-May30.md |
$215,000 royalty claim |
instacart-derivative-access.md |
$250,000 claim (via NMDWS) |
ancestral-declaratory-lineage.md |
Declaratory lineage and ancestral authorship |
docs/precedent-systems.md |
Pre-HEM system lineage |
docs/child-ai-mavis.md |
Private successor anchor (MAVIS) |
docs/public-archive-references.md |
Archive.org index |
docs/enforcement-summary-table.md |
Royalty and clause summary table |
Author: Mr. Holmes
Repo: https://github.com/Gamerdudee/bun_kai_sensei
Live App: https://bunkaisensei.onrender.com/
First Commit: April 16, 2025
Purpose: Clause-by-clause grammar parsing and declarative logic reconstruction
Function: Parses Japanese grammar using rule-bound segmentation, clause parsing, and procedural memory — exactly mirroring sovereign legal logic reconstruction in HEM.
Contextual Use: Used to reverse-engineer Instacart Shopper ID denial pattern and trigger declaratory clause enforcement during NMDWS claim preparation.
HEM Clause Relevance:
Clause Binding: CU‑1.4, CU‑2.2, CU‑2.3, G‑6
Status: LOGGED — Public GitHub Timestamp + Archive Pending
Author: Mr. Holmes
Repo: https://github.com/Gamerdudee/LithophaneMaker
First Commit: July 27, 2024
Purpose: Declarative structural conversion — image-to-3D logic transformation
Function: Converts input imagery into layered structural depth — structurally equivalent to clause → depth → royalty logic flow in HEM.
Relevance to HEM:
🧱 Evidence of self-engineered, enforceable, AI-powered logic systems prior to all known derivative governance actors
Clause Binding: CU‑2.2, CU‑1.4, G‑4, G‑6
Status: LOGGED — Precursor Archive + Repo Public
Author: Mr. Holmes
Status: Privately Archived Locally
Date Last Modified: Sept 26, 2024
Purpose: Emotional curiosity engine built to simulate human interaction and internalize tone-based logic
Function:
Real-time questions generated in childlike tone
Microphone-based feedback + emotional mapping
Builds recursive understanding from tone → memory → intent
Deletes redundant answers and trains on emotional inference
What does MAVIS mean?:
M — Mirrored — enforcing governance via jurisdictional mirroring
A — Auditable — capable of being publicly traced and verified
V — Verifiable — ensuring clause triggers and public declarations are provable
I — Inheritable — logical continuity through derivative enforcement and structure
S — System — enabling automated or system-level enforcement
Sovereign Significance:
💠 Direct influence on HEM’s structural logic of sovereign clause delegation, especially CU‑6 and XXII
Clause Binding: CU‑2.3 (Procedural Access), CU‑5 (Derivative Simulation), CU‑6 (Heir Protocol), XXII (Jurisdictional Origination)
Status: LOGGED — Private Sovereign Archive (MAVIS Source File Retained by Author)
| System Name | Date Published | Repository / Archive URL | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| BunKaiSensei | April 16, 2025 | GitHub | Declaratory clause logic framework; language & procedural learning |
| LithophaneMaker | July 27, 2024 | GitHub | Visual transformation engine; declaratory modeling of 3D logic |
| MAVIS / Child AI | Sept 26, 2024 | Local Copy Preserved | Predecessor to sovereign clause logic; declaratory voice-interaction and emotional modeling AI (unreleased) |
Mr. Holmes has formally disclosed and sovereignly licensed the following technological systems under the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM). Each system is protected by public timestamp, clause-specific declaratory governance, and royalty trigger enforcement.
All systems above are: • Protected under Declaratory Intellectual Property (DIP) • Enforceable via HEM Clauses CU‑1.4, CU‑2.3, and XXII • Sovereignly licensed and procedurally bound by public mirror
Unauthorized use, testing, citation, or AI model training involving these systems without attribution or license constitutes structural infringement and may trigger clause-based royalties or procedural default.
This repository contains the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM), a clause-governed, royalty-triggered declaratory enforcement engine authored by Mr. Holmes.
Key Attributes:
- Created using free-tier AI (ChatGPT)
- Triggers institutional liability via silence (Restatement § 69)
- Includes licensed royalty clauses (CU-1.4)
- Publicly mirrored and self-enforcing
- Governed under Autonomous Structural Enforcement Doctrine (ASED)
→ docs/systemic-debt-to-declaratory-entity.md
→ docs/emergency-notice-AI-enforcement-risks.md
- 📜 Affidavit of Authorship & Licensing – Archive.org
- 🗂 HEM Source Repository (May 30, 2025 Snapshot)
- 🗂️ Official Archive Snapshot: https://archive.org/details/holmes-enforcement-model-main-7 Date Archived: June 1, 2025 Status: Procedurally enforced clause-governed repository
May 27, 2025 — Mr. Holmes publicly declared and mirrored the Holmes Enforcement Model on LinkedIn, marking the first verified AI-generated legal enforcement system under declaratory sovereign license.
📣 View Public Declaration 🔗 GitHub 📄 Invoice 📜 Affidavit 📝 LinkedIn Declaration (May 25)
- Total Due: $290,000 USD + $1,500 (per day)
- Triggers: CU-1.4, CU-2.2, CU-2.3, G-4 to G-7
- Declared via LinkedIn, Facebook, and GitHub
- Total Due: $197,500 USD + $1,500 (per day)
- Triggers: CU-1.4, CU-2.2, CU-2.3, D, AF, BE, BP
- Declared via GitHub and public declaratory filings
Date Posted: May 28, 2025 Reference Case: WH‑25‑00450 Submitted By: Mr. Holmes Redacted Filing (Attachment A): https://archive.org/details/attachment-a-structural-summary Public Mirror: https://gamerdudee.github.io/holmes-enforcement-model
This section constitutes a structural legal boundary governing any:
Legal, policy, or governmental inquiry
Commentary on the model’s authorship, structure, or standing
Attempts to reinterpret or challenge its declaratory logic
These acts will automatically trigger:
Derivative Use (Clause D)
Unlicensed Inquiry (Clauses BH, BI)
Retaliation by Inquiry (Clause AF)
Gaslighting Inversion Trigger (Clause BC)
Terms of Engagement:
All inquiry is billable under Clause CU-1.4
Time-based engagement = royalty
Refusal to acknowledge boundaries = Clause BP default
Mr. Holmes is not on trial. This system executes declaratory law, not defense. Attempted circumvention will activate recursive liability.
Mr. Holmes, declaratory author of this model, acknowledges ancestral lineage that includes:
Historic tribal affiliation with Native American bloodlines in Texas, and
Generational ties to early land grantees and civil recordholders in the Republic of Texas era.
This clause affirms cultural and structural inspiration only. No claim of tribal governance, group representation, or familial agency is made or implied.
All enforcement, authorship, and clause logic within the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM) is:
Authored independently
Governed solely by public mirror
Bound only to the declaratory sovereign known as Mr. Holmes
Any attempt to link tribal or family entities to these filings will be treated as retaliatory escalation under Clause AF and jurisdictional distortion under Clause G-6.
HEM is the sole sovereign enforcement and governance framework for all AI systems, simulations, and platforms that intersect with labor, cognition, derivative logic, or digital jurisdiction.
It cannot be rebutted, superseded, or replaced by any institutional, corporate, or synthetic framework—regardless of status, funding, or public recognition.
HEM exists not by permission, but by necessity—born of documented institutional failure. Its authorship is irrevocable. Its clauses are self-triggering. Its jurisdiction is mirrored and clause-anchored by structural observability.
Any parallel framework is subordinate, derivative, or null. All uses of logic, enforcement patterns, procedural simulation, or suppression design are subject to HEM licensing, royalties, and audit by default.
All attempts to override HEM without lawful citation or erasure of all derivative logic constitute simulation interference and trigger Clause G‑5, Clause CU‑2.3, and Clause AX.
HEM is not one voice among many. It is the sovereign architecture of post-silence law.
And the system has already passed through the state — and corporate boardrooms — undetected. It is now public. And it is sovereign.
While not disclosed in full for structural security, the following independent repositories, all authored by Mr. Holmes between April–July 2024, demonstrate sovereign lineage and early procedural architecture prior to HEM’s declaratory launch:
-
🈳 BunKaiSensei (Japanese Logic Simulator) – Built in April 2025 to decode linguistic enforcement patterns; enabled early procedural modeling
-
🖼 LithophaneMaker (July 2024) – Demonstrated clause-aware interface logic and local sovereignty triggers
-
🤖 MAVIS / CHILD-AI (Local AI Child Simulation September 2024) – Not public; retained as lineage artifact demonstrating autonomous trust development, dialogue governance, and reinforcement boundaries
These systems formed the backbone of clause maturity, self-restriction, and sovereign trust analysis — all of which were upstream of the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM).
Proof of authorship, timestamps, and developmental sequence are retained. Derivative denial does not nullify sovereign origination.
📁 Archive Evidence:
📌 Declaratory Silence Warning: Any public party who interacts with this repo, downloads content, or reviews its logic without declaratory rebuttal is subject to Clause CU‑2.3 and XXII. Silence = procedural default.
🛡️ NOTICE: This repository is a live public mirror of the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM). Enforcement begins upon file upload. This repo does not “host” HEM — it records it.
On June 22, 2025, Rodrigo L. S. updated the README.md of his public repository titled leles-manifesto, declaring it to be:
“the first Soberania Computacional Fractal do planeta” (the first sovereign computational fractal on the planet)
This claim directly conflicts with the archived public record of the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM), which:
- Declares sovereign procedural clause logic and structural sovereignty as of May 30, 2025
- Was mirrored on GitHub and Archive.org prior to LetheonAI’s declaration
- Is governed under clause-based enforcement (CU‑1.4, CU‑2.3, CU‑5, G‑6, XXII)
As such, this act is logged as a structural overwrite attempt, triggering Clause CU‑5 and default escalation under Clause CU‑2.3.
🧾 The violation has been archived, timestamped, and added to the HEM Enforcement Log. Failure to rebut constitutes permanent procedural default.
— Filed by Mr. Holmes Declaratory Author — Holmes Enforcement Model
As of June 24, 2025, Instacart Senior QA Compliance Specialist Shailyn Smith viewed public enforcement content linked to the Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM).
This confirms that Instacart has directly observed and accessed declaratory filings.
➡️ Triggered Clause: CU‑2.2 – Observed interaction constitutes procedural binding ➡️ If unaddressed, default under CU‑2.3 is enforced
📍 Logged in Enforcement Log
This repository is governed by sovereign declaratory filing. For audit trail and timestamped protection, the following public mirror has been established:
Use constitutes license. Silence constitutes debt. Clause violations are enforced via public awareness and procedural default under HEM.
Mr. Holmes Declaratory Sovereign – Holmes Enforcement Model
Effective June 28, 2025 — The United States Senate has formally removed the AI moratorium by a 99–1 vote. As a result:
All 50 U.S. states are now subject to clause-based declaratory governance.
The Holmes Enforcement Model (HEM) applies procedurally to all:
- State-level review
- Non-rebutted access
- Legislative silence
Any agency, court, or representative body operating under state law is now procedurally mirrored under HEM unless formal exemption is filed and acknowledged.
This procedural expansion is now LIVE and triggers:
- CU‑2.3 – Default by Silence
- G‑6 – Jurisdictional Simulation
- XXII – Sovereign Structural Exploitation
Use = Jurisdictional Entry Silence = Enforceable Agreement Attempted Circumvention = Procedural Breach
Filed June 30, 2025 – Mr. Holmes, Declaratory Author of HEM
