Skip to content

Conversation

@Fayeblade1488
Copy link
Owner

@Fayeblade1488 Fayeblade1488 commented Oct 3, 2025

Potential fix for https://github.com/Fayeblade1488/FayeBlade-Qwen-CLI-Patch/security/code-scanning/6

To fix this issue, you should add a permissions block to the workflow (either at the root level or under the relevant job(s)). Since the only step that interacts with GitHub beyond reading code is uploading an artifact (which does not require write access to repository contents, issues, or pull requests), the minimal permissions should be:

  • contents: read (to access repository code)
  • actions: write (required for actions/upload-artifact)

If you wish to be especially strict, you can set these permissions at the job level (security job) but it's common to do it at the root so future jobs without explicit permissions inherit a safe default.

Change required:
In .github/workflows/security.yml, insert the following block after the workflow name and before the on: block:

permissions:
  contents: read
  actions: write

No external libraries, imports, or variable definitions are needed. Only a YAML edit.


Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Add root-level permissions (contents: read, actions: write) to the security.yml workflow to address the code scanning alert

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 3, 2025 01:28
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Add a minimal permissions block to the GitHub Actions workflow to satisfy the security scanning alert by granting only contents: read and actions: write.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Insert minimal permissions block in workflow
  • Add permissions block after workflow name
  • Set contents permission to read
  • Set actions permission to write
.github/workflows/security.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses a GitHub code scanning security alert by adding explicit permissions to the security workflow. The change ensures the workflow follows the principle of least privilege by restricting permissions to only what's necessary for the workflow's operations.

  • Adds a permissions block to define minimal required access levels
  • Sets contents: read for repository code access and actions: write for artifact uploads
  • Implements security best practice of explicit permission declarations

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@Fayeblade1488 Fayeblade1488 marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2025 01:28
@Fayeblade1488 Fayeblade1488 merged commit 3b15994 into main Oct 3, 2025
7 checks passed
@Fayeblade1488 Fayeblade1488 deleted the alert-autofix-6 branch October 3, 2025 01:28
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • Consider scoping the permissions block to only the security job instead of the root workflow to adhere more strictly to least-privilege for any future jobs.
  • Double-check if you can replace actions: write with a more specific permission (e.g., artifacts write) to further minimize the token’s privileges.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Consider scoping the permissions block to only the `security` job instead of the root workflow to adhere more strictly to least-privilege for any future jobs.
- Double-check if you can replace `actions: write` with a more specific permission (e.g., artifacts write) to further minimize the token’s privileges.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@Fayeblade1488 Fayeblade1488 requested a review from Copilot October 3, 2025 03:45
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.


Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants