Testing conditions for statistical peer review

[Rekyt]

This PR aims to fix issues following the process of statistical peer review by rOpenSci

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.72%. Comparing base (b87945c) to head (c9c8531).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
R/fb_make_report.R	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #140      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.14%   98.72%   +3.57%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        1958     1955       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1863     1930      +67     
+ Misses         95       25      -70     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Rekyt]

Let's merge this branch first, then try to follow autotest and srr in another one.

[ahasverus]

Thanks!