experiment: Implement new raw/jpeg grouping #451
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

I'm only getting started on this, and it'll likely need a while to be anywhere useful, or if that's a feature you or the community even want. Regardless, it's a nice learning exercise. 😁
I'm using a Fuji camera and regularly shoot JPEG+RAW to have the best of both worlds, straight out of camera JPEGs which are 80% of the time great, and RAWs for special occasions.
I haven't seen that in other software yet (or I'm blind), so I started experimenting with a grouping feature that groups identical pictures but with different formats and shows, for example, only the JPEG by default, and then in the detail view I can switch to the RAW image.
Example, showcasing my "problem"
And here's the very first iteration implementing that grouping:
Next I want to explore extending the overall indexing to build association links between "identical" files, so that this becomes easier to manage or maybe even for other features. I've seen such an "associated files" already exists when deleting files for example. How reliable such detection eventually will be, needs some testing I suppose.